Comparison

e vs ZOLL Respond

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

e

This app enables secure sharing of voice, text, photos, data, and live video for healthcare professionals. It supports HIPAA-compliant communication, improving patient care and decision-making in various medical scenarios.

Highlights
  • HIPAA-secure voice, text, photo, data sharing
  • Live video streaming
  • Record and log for quality assessment
  • Patient privacy protection
  • Real-world use cases for stroke, trauma, and more
  • Enhanced situational awareness
Features
Read full description

GD e-Bridge(TM) Mobile Telemedicine App for EMS, Public Safety and Healthcare. GD e-Bridge is listed in the FirstNet App Catalog™. With GD e-Bridge Mobile Telemedicine, share HIPAA-secure voice, text, photos, data, video clips and stream live with confidence and ease using your smartphone, tablet, Toughbook or PC. Plus record, and log for quality assessment, training and medical-legal documentation. The results? Speedy and reliable multi-media communication with EMS, physicians, specialists and hospitals anywhere. Improved decision-making. Enhanced situational awareness. Features to help provide better quality, and more cost-effective patient care. The Future of Connected Care is Already in Your Hands. Protect patient privacy: - HIPAA-compliant - Password protected - Fully encrypted - Photos, videos can only be sent to an approved network - Photos, videos not stored in device gallery Get the Full Picture: Real-World Uses for GD e-Bridge - Stroke – Send recorded or live streaming video of the prehospital stroke assessment to the hospital or stroke center. - Trauma – Share pictures from the scene of the mechanism of injury with trauma teams to help with decisions and team preparation. - Mobile integrated healthcare/community paramedicine – Enable telemedicine consults between the patient and their physician with live streaming video. - Burns or wounds – Share pictures to enable physicians to better advise EMS on wound care prior to arrival and make optimal transport decisions. - Transport refusals – Video against medical advice patient refusals for liability protection. - Mass casualty – Send pictures, video clips or live streaming video from the scene to physicians, emergency communications or command centers to improve triage, situational awareness and resource allocation. - Bio/chemical/hazmat event – Photos, video clips or live streaming from the scene can help minimize the number of responders, healthcare providers and members of the public exposed, improve triage and ensure patients are taken to facilities equipped to handle such emergencies. GD e-Bridge tracking feature: Continued use of GPS running in the background can dramatically decrease battery life.

About

ZOLL Respond

This application enables response crews, dispatchers, and medical facilities to view and manage their trips. It provides navigation to pick-up and drop-off locations for existing customers.

Highlights
  • View and respond to trips
  • Navigate to pick-up points
  • Navigate to drop-off points
  • Manage response crew activities
  • Coordinate with dispatchers
  • Connect medical facilities
Features
Read full description

ZOLL Respond allows existing ZOLL customers the ability for response crews, dispatchers, and medical facilities to view and respond to their trips and navigate to pick-up and drop-off points.

Screenshots

e4 screens
ZOLL Respond1 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: e at 80% against ZOLL Respond's 0%. e also leads on rating (4.3 vs 3.4). ZOLL Respond's advantage is iOS requirement (13.0 vs 16.0). On price, ratings volume, update cadence and ads there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

e holds the better App Store score, 4.3 against 3.4. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 15 and 30 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 80% of e's written reviews are positive against 0% of ZOLL Respond's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly every 5 weeks. The most recent releases landed on November 6, 2026 and November 2, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
e versus ZOLL Respond: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParametereZOLL Respond
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.3 (15 ratings) — better3.4 (30 ratings)
Positive reviews80.0% of reviews — better0.0% of reviews
Number of ratings1530 — better
Update frequencyEvery 5 weeksEvery 5 weeks
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPadiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS16.013.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size251 MB135 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperGeneral DevicesZOLL Data Systems, Inc.

Customer experience

e

All ratings15 ratings
Positive80.0%
Neutral6.7%
Negative13.3%
Written reviews5 reviews
Positive80.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative20.0%

ZOLL Respond

All ratings30 ratings
Positive56.7%
Neutral3.3%
Negative40.0%
Written reviews4 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

In-app purchases

None

e

No in-app purchases

None

ZOLL Respond

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is e free?
e is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is ZOLL Respond free?
ZOLL Respond is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, e or ZOLL Respond?
e is rated higher. e averages 4.3 out of 5 from 15 ratings, while ZOLL Respond averages 3.4 from 30 ratings.
Do e or ZOLL Respond have ads?
Neither e nor ZOLL Respond shows ads.
Which is updated more often, e or ZOLL Respond?
e ships an update every 5 weeks, and ZOLL Respond every 5 weeks. Most recently, e was updated on November 6, 2026 and ZOLL Respond on November 2, 2026.

Other comparisons