Comparison

Artic Practice vs VivaLing

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Artic Practice

Features
Read full description

More Speech Therapy for school and home practice! This app has 536 colorful drawings to hold children’s interest as they practice their good speech. Focus on Initial, Medial, and Consonant phonemes along with Consonant Clusters and some Vowels + R. Each picture has a button with the word, the sounds in the word, a phrase and sentence containing the word. And a question and answer to stimulate discussion using the picture as a starting point. A clear speech model is presented for the child to imitate and they can record and play back their own speech. The clinician can choose from three scoring methods. 1. Score each response as correct, distorted or incorrect. 2. Score responses as correct, distorted, substituted, or omitted. 3. Score productions based on whether they are spontaneously correct/incorrect or imitatively correct/incorrect. This app uses the content from the Word Practice game from LocuTour’s Artic Games & More CD.

About

VivaLing

Connect with native-speaking language coaches for personalized, real-time video lessons. This platform offers immersive learning experiences designed to help you thrive in new environments.

Highlights
  • Personalized 1-on-1 video sessions
  • Native-level language coaches
  • Interactive and immersive learning
  • Real-time feedback
  • Global collaboration through education
Features
Read full description

VivaLing is a language learning ecosystem that inspires global collaboration through education. We connect language learners with professional, native-level Coaches for 100% personalized, interactive, and immersive real-time video sessions from the comfort of their home. VivaLing Coaches are fully trained, continuously monitored for quality, and provided with online resources and curriculum that enable language learners to thrive in new environments.

Screenshots

Artic Practice4 screens
VivaLing4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is price: VivaLing at Free against Artic Practice's $9.99. VivaLing also leads on update cadence (every 2 months vs every 9 months). Artic Practice's advantage is iOS requirement (9.0 vs 15.0). On ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

VivaLing is free to download; Artic Practice costs $9.99 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Artic Practice ships an update every 9 months, VivaLing every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on May 15, 2026 and October 29, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
Artic Practice versus VivaLing: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterArtic PracticeVivaLing
Price$9.99Free — better
Rating—3.0 (2 ratings) — better
Positive reviews—33.3% of reviews
Number of ratings—2 — better
Update frequencyEvery 9 monthsEvery 2 months — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
Monetization—Free
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS9.0 — better15.0
Further details — not scored
Size111 MB262 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperLearning Fundamentals, Inc.VivaLing Pte Ltd

In-app purchases

None

Artic Practice

No in-app purchases

None

VivaLing

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Artic Practice free?
Artic Practice costs $9.99, with no in-app purchases.
Is VivaLing free?
VivaLing is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do Artic Practice or VivaLing have ads?
Neither Artic Practice nor VivaLing shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Artic Practice or VivaLing?
Artic Practice ships an update every 9 months, and VivaLing every 2 months. Most recently, Artic Practice was updated on May 15, 2026 and VivaLing on October 29, 2026.

Other comparisons