Comparison

SharkRF Link vs OpLine

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

SharkRF Link

Access the management web interface for your SharkRF devices using their unique identifiers. This application also functions as a transceiver for compatible devices.

Highlights
  • Open device web interface
  • Use device UIDs
  • Transceiver functionality
  • Beta version access
Features
Read full description

The SharkRF Link app lets you open the management web interface of your SharkRF devices based on their UIDs. You can also use the app as a transceiver in case the connected device supports this. Note: beta version, provided “AS IS” without any warranty of any kind.

About

OpLine

This app provides licensed amateur radio operators with a fast, native iOS client for the AllStarLink network. It offers push-to-talk functionality, live net schedules, smart favorites, and real-time telemetry for a reliable mobile experience.

Highlights
  • Push to Talk (hold or toggle)
  • Live Net Schedule with alerts
  • Smart Favorites for nodes and nets
  • Real-Time Telemetry (RX/TX meters)
  • Worldwide AllStarLink node coverage
  • Native iOS design with dark mode
Features
Read full description

OpLine - AllStarLink in Your Pocket Connect to AllStarLink nodes anywhere your iPhone has signal. OpLine is a fast, native iOS client for licensed amateur radio operators who want a clean, reliable way to get on the network without fiddling with desktop tools or generic SIP clients. KEY FEATURES Push to Talk Hold-to-talk or tap-to-toggle. Lock the mic when you need both hands free. Designed to feel like a real radio. Live Net Schedule Browse upcoming nets, filter by region or favorites, and set alerts before they start. Never miss a check-in. Smart Favorites Save your daily-driver nodes and the nets you actually attend. Group them however makes sense to you. Real-Time Telemetry RX/TX activity meters, connection status, and link tracking. See exactly what's happening on the network. Worldwide Coverage Connect to any AllStarLink node, from your local repeater to international hubs. Native iOS Built for iPhone with the polish you'd expect. Dark mode, responsive controls, low latency. REQUIREMENTS - A valid FCC-issued amateur radio license and call sign are required to transmit. - An AllStarLink node connection. Your own ASL3 Raspberry Pi node is recommended — see opline.app/setup for a free build guide. - Standard amateur radio rules apply: identify with your call sign, follow Part 97 (or your country's equivalent). WHY OPLINE Most AllStarLink clients started as desktop tools and got retrofitted for mobile. OpLine was designed iPhone-first: instant connect, sub-second PTT response, clean telemetry, and a UI that respects your time. No subscriptions. No ads. No data collection beyond what's needed to make the app work. Built by a licensed ham who wanted a better way to get on the air from a phone. NEW TO HAM RADIO? Visit opline.app/license for a quick guide to getting your Technician license — the only license you need to use OpLine, and the test is more accessible than you'd think. 73, - OpLine

Screenshots

SharkRF Link4 screens
OpLine3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: OpLine at 100% against SharkRF Link's 19%. OpLine also leads on rating (5.0 vs 2.4) and update cadence (weekly vs every 3 weeks). SharkRF Link's advantage is price (Free vs $9.99) and ratings volume (30 vs 3). On ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

SharkRF Link is free to download; OpLine costs $9.99 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

OpLine holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 2.4. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: SharkRF Link has 30 ratings behind it against 3, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 19% of SharkRF Link's written reviews are positive against 100% of OpLine's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

SharkRF Link ships an update every 3 weeks, OpLine weekly. The most recent releases landed on October 21, 2026 and October 10, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard8 real differences · 3 level
SharkRF Link versus OpLine: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterSharkRF LinkOpLine
PriceFree — better$9.99
Rating2.4 (30 ratings)5.0 (3 ratings) — better
Positive reviews19.0% of reviews100.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings30 — better3
Update frequencyEvery 3 weeksWeekly — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree — betterPaid
Best chart rank—#20 — better
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPad
Requires iOS9.0 — better17.0
Further details — not scored
Size18 MB6 MB
Age rating4+9+
DeveloperSharkRF OUJustin Calvert

Customer experience

SharkRF Link

All ratings24 ratings
Positive25.0%
Neutral16.7%
Negative58.3%
Written reviews21 reviews
Positive19.0%
Neutral14.3%
Negative66.7%

OpLine

All ratings3 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

SharkRF Link

No in-app purchases

None

OpLine

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is SharkRF Link free?
SharkRF Link is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is OpLine free?
OpLine costs $9.99, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, SharkRF Link or OpLine?
OpLine is rated higher. SharkRF Link averages 2.4 out of 5 from 30 ratings, while OpLine averages 5.0 from 3 ratings.
Do SharkRF Link or OpLine have ads?
Neither SharkRF Link nor OpLine shows ads.
Which is updated more often, SharkRF Link or OpLine?
SharkRF Link ships an update every 3 weeks, and OpLine weekly. Most recently, SharkRF Link was updated on October 21, 2026 and OpLine on October 10, 2026.

Other comparisons