WAS vs Sphinx Cat Stickers
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
WAS
Easily switch between mobile and desktop website views with a single click. Test your own websites or browse any site as it would appear on different devices using custom user-agent strings. This browser simplifies cross-device testing without needing emulators.
- Switch between mobile and desktop views
- Change user-agent strings
- Built-in WebView browser
- Add custom user agents
- Quick compatibility testing settings
- Content verification tools
Read full descriptionHide full description
The WAS browser allows you to switch between mobile and desktop views of a website with one click. Now you can browse any site or test your own by changing the user-agent string—which determines how the website is displayed. With the built-in WebView browser, you can see how your site will look on various smartphones, screens, and devices without needing to buy them or install additional emulators. WAS offers a wide range of built-in user agents, but if they aren't enough, you can easily add or create your own. Additionally, the application includes many built-in settings for quick compatibility testing and content verification. Download the app now and say goodbye to the hassle of testing websites on different devices!
Sphinx Cat Stickers
Enhance your iMessage chats with a collection of unique Sphinx Cat stickers. Express yourself with these charming and expressive designs.
- Sphinx Cat sticker collection
- iMessage integration
- Expressive designs
- Unique visuals
Read full descriptionHide full description
Set of Sphinx Cat stickers for your iMessage conversations.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is rating: Sphinx Cat Stickers at 5.0 against WAS's 4.6. Sphinx Cat Stickers also leads on price ($0.99 vs $2.49). WAS's advantage is ratings volume (96 vs 1) and chart position (#196 vs unranked). On ads, in-app purchases, monetization model and device support there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
WAS costs $2.49 and Sphinx Cat Stickers $0.99 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
Sphinx Cat Stickers holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 4.6. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: WAS has 96 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two.
| Parameter | WAS | Sphinx Cat Stickers |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.49 | $0.99 — better |
| Rating | 4.6 (96 ratings) | 5.0 (1 ratings) — better |
| Positive reviews | 53.8% of reviews | — |
| Number of ratings | 96 — better | 1 |
| Update frequency | Fortnightly | — |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Paid | Paid |
| Best chart rank | #196 — better | — |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, Mac — better | iPhone, iPad |
| Requires iOS | 16.0 | 16.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 9 MB | 3 MB |
| Age rating | 17+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Andreii Simaranov | Paul Scott |
Customer experience
WAS
Sphinx Cat Stickers
In-app purchases
WAS
No in-app purchases
Sphinx Cat Stickers
No in-app purchases
