Comparison

WAS vs AES67 Handy

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

WAS

Easily switch between mobile and desktop website views with a single click. Test your own websites or browse any site as it would appear on different devices using custom user-agent strings. This browser simplifies cross-device testing without needing emulators.

Highlights
  • Switch between mobile and desktop views
  • Change user-agent strings
  • Built-in WebView browser
  • Add custom user agents
  • Quick compatibility testing settings
  • Content verification tools
Features
Read full description

The WAS browser allows you to switch between mobile and desktop views of a website with one click. Now you can browse any site or test your own by changing the user-agent string—which determines how the website is displayed. With the built-in WebView browser, you can see how your site will look on various smartphones, screens, and devices without needing to buy them or install additional emulators. WAS offers a wide range of built-in user agents, but if they aren't enough, you can easily add or create your own. Additionally, the application includes many built-in settings for quick compatibility testing and content verification. Download the app now and say goodbye to the hassle of testing websites on different devices!

About

AES67 Handy

Read full description

AES67 Handy is a network audio utility for live sound engineers. It discovers AES67 & ST2110-30 & RAVENNA devices on the local network, shows live channel levels, and provides volume, mute, hide and lock controls. It also lists AES67 & ST2110-30 streams via SAP. Works on iPhone and iPad. No data is collected.

Screenshots

WAS3 screens
AES67 Handy3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is price: AES67 Handy at Free against WAS's $2.49. On ads, in-app purchases, device support and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

AES67 Handy is free to download; WAS costs $2.49 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard1 real difference · 9 level
WAS versus AES67 Handy: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterWASAES67 Handy
Price$2.49Free — better
Rating4.6 (96 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews53.8% of reviews—
Number of ratings96 — better—
Update frequencyFortnightly—
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationPaid—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, MaciPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS16.015.6 — better
Further details — not scored
Size9 MB8 MB
Age rating17+4+
DeveloperAndreii SimaranovDigisyn Co.,Ltd

In-app purchases

None

WAS

No in-app purchases

None

AES67 Handy

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is WAS free?
WAS costs $2.49, with no in-app purchases.
Is AES67 Handy free?
AES67 Handy is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do WAS or AES67 Handy have ads?
Neither WAS nor AES67 Handy shows ads.

Other comparisons