Comparison

Cifer . Fun vs Neo

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Cifer . Fun

Communicate securely and anonymously with advanced encryption. Create an anonymous agent number for contact without revealing your personal details until you choose to. Enjoy peace of mind in a world where privacy is often compromised.

Highlights
  • Advanced cryptologic encryption
  • Anonymous agent number
  • Secure communication
  • Privacy control
  • Ease of mind
Read full description

The Fun is amazing. The security is only lower than our premium product. An enclosed, anonymous endpoint, cryptologic, super-computer denial encryption to give you security and ease of mind, in a world always in your business. Use responsibly. Never met anyone without a friend knowing all the details. But have an anonymous 'agent' number to use for contact, without going through your Telcom company system, until you are ready to give out your 'actual' phone number. It's worth the money for the control of the situation.

About

Neo

This app is a feature-rich client for the Matrix chat protocol, offering advanced functionalities like local AI chats, RSS feeds, and customizable notifications. It provides a futuristic and efficient way to communicate and manage your conversations.

Highlights
  • Local AI chats and summarization
  • RSS feed reader
  • Room folders for organization
  • Customizable notifications and reactions
  • Online GIF picker
  • Message search functionality
  • Encrypted room support
Features
Read full description

Neo is a futuristic Matrix client built for speed, focus, and modern communication. Move quickly through Matrix rooms, spaces, threads with a modern and clean UI. Sign in with your Matrix account, join rooms, send rich messages, organize conversations with Threads and Matrix Spaces, and navigate everything from a fast sidebar. Neo supports encrypted rooms, image video sharing, reactions, threads, voice and video calls, rich notifications, RSS feeds, and local message translation with a single tap. Core Matrix Features • Sign in with username/password or SSO • Support for regular and encrypted Matrix rooms • Send text, images, videos, files, GIFs, stickers, and reactions • Use threads to keep long conversations on track • Organize rooms with native Matrix Spaces • Rich notifications with avatars and message previews • Voice and video calls Neo Extras • Fast sidebar navigation for rooms and spaces • Online GIF picker powered by Tenor • Message search • One-tap downloads for images, videos, and GIFs • RSS feed subscriptions and in-app reading • News view with RSS integration • Sticker picker, including Memoji stickers • Per-contact notification modes • Custom notification sounds • Custom default reaction emojis • Emoji folders • Local message translation • Foldable Markdown code blocks • Apple Intelligence message summaries on supported devices EULA / Terms of Service: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mszpro/Privacy-Policy/refs/heads/main/neo-matrix-tos.md Privacy Policy: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mszpro/Privacy-Policy/refs/heads/main/neo-privacy-policy.md

Screenshots

Cifer . Fun4 screens
Neo4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: Cifer . Fun at 5.0 against Neo's 3.3. Cifer . Fun also leads on iOS requirement (13.0 vs 18.4). Neo's advantage is update cadence (every 10 days vs every 2 months) and ratings volume (7 vs 1). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Cifer . Fun sells 2 one-off in-app purchases and Neo sells 2 in-app purchases, starting at $0.99 per month. Whichever you choose, the download price is not the number that matters.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Cifer . Fun holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 3.3. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: Neo has 7 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Cifer . Fun ships an update every 2 months, Neo every 10 days. The most recent releases landed on October 16, 2026 and October 20, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
Cifer . Fun versus Neo: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterCifer . FunNeo
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (1 ratings) — better3.3 (7 ratings)
Positive reviews—42.9% of reviews
Number of ratings17 — better
Update frequencyEvery 2 monthsEvery 10 days — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesYesYes
MonetizationFree with in-app purchasesFreemium
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPad
Requires iOS13.0 — better18.4
Further details — not scored
Size59 MB255 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperThe Worldwide Exchange InternationalAsterKit

Customer experience

Cifer . Fun

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

Neo

All ratings7 ratings
Positive57.1%
Neutral0.0%
Negative42.9%
Written reviews7 reviews
Positive42.9%
Neutral0.0%
Negative57.1%

In-app purchases

2 purchases

Cifer . Fun

One-time2
  • Cifer.Fun Monthly Subscription$0.99
  • Cifer.Fun Annual Subscription$9.99
2 purchases

Neo

Subscriptions1
  • Nil Pro Monthly Subscription$0.991 Month
One-time1
  • Nil Pro Lifetime$8.99

Questions

Is Cifer . Fun free?
Cifer . Fun is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is Neo free?
Neo is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, Cifer . Fun or Neo?
Cifer . Fun is rated higher. Cifer . Fun averages 5.0 out of 5 from 1 ratings, while Neo averages 3.3 from 7 ratings.
Do Cifer . Fun or Neo have ads?
Neither Cifer . Fun nor Neo shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Cifer . Fun or Neo?
Cifer . Fun ships an update every 2 months, and Neo every 10 days. Most recently, Cifer . Fun was updated on October 16, 2026 and Neo on October 20, 2026.

Other comparisons