Comparison

Haptics vs CuePulse for Swift

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Haptics

This tool allows developers and designers to test and refine haptic feedback on iOS, iPadOS, and Apple Watch devices. Visualize feedback intensity in real-time and access code snippets for easy implementation.

Highlights
  • Test Impact, Notification, and Selection haptics
  • Adjust intensity and patterns
  • Real-time visual feedback graphs
  • Device-specific testing for iOS, iPadOS, Apple Watch
  • Sample code snippets for implementation
Features
Read full description

Haptic is the ultimate tool for developers and designers to test and optimize haptic feedback on iOS devices. Key Features: Wide Range of Haptic Types: Test Impact, Notification, and Selection haptics across a variety of intensities and patterns. Experiment with different styles to find the perfect feedback for each interaction in your app. Real-Time Visual Feedback: Visualize haptic intensity through dynamic, real-time graphs and charts, helping you understand and adjust the feedback’s feel with clarity. Device-Specific Testing: Test haptics not only for iOS devices but also for iPadOS and Apple Watch, enabling a consistent and responsive haptic experience across multiple platforms. Easy Code Snippets: Quickly access sample code snippets for each haptic type, making it simpler to implement or adjust haptic features in your app's codebase. Haptics Feedback ensures your app delivers a refined and enjoyable experience for users, enhancing every touchpoint and bringing your designs to life with tactile precision.

About

CuePulse for Swift

Features
Read full description

CuePulse lets iPhone app developers and designers compare sounds and haptics for common interface actions. Tap any cue to hear it. Turn on Haptics to feel the matching pattern on a supported iPhone. Use Play all cues to compare the full collection. Each cue includes Swift code for sound, haptic, and both together. Tap Copy and paste the example into an app that uses the CuePulse Swift package. The app includes fourteen cues for confirmations, errors, toggles, loading, navigation, and other common actions. The sounds are created on the device by the CuePulse package. CuePulse does not require an account. It has no ads or analytics and collects no personal data. CuePulse is based on the original Cuelume sound palette by Daniel Belyi. Both projects use the MIT License.

Screenshots

Haptics4 screens
CuePulse for Swift2 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: CuePulse for Swift at none against Haptics's 2. Haptics's advantage is device support (3 vs 1). On price, ads and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Haptics sells 2 one-off in-app purchases. CuePulse for Swift asks for nothing beyond the download.

Scorecard2 real differences · 7 level
Haptics versus CuePulse for Swift: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterHapticsCuePulse for Swift
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.0 (2 ratings) — better—
Number of ratings2 — better—
Update frequencyEvery 3 months—
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesYesNo — better
MonetizationFree—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, Apple Watch — betteriPhone
Requires iOS16.016.0
Further details — not scored
Size17 MB3 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperIvan ObodianskyiMichael Danko

In-app purchases

2 purchases

Haptics

One-time2
  • Test Haptic Tool Unlimited$1.99
  • Test Haptic Vibration Tool$4.99
None

CuePulse for Swift

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Haptics free?
Haptics is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is CuePulse for Swift free?
CuePulse for Swift is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do Haptics or CuePulse for Swift have ads?
Neither Haptics nor CuePulse for Swift shows ads.

Other comparisons