Comparison

Calorie Tracker vs SugarShift

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Calorie Tracker

This app helps you track your calorie intake by answering questions for a personalized plan and scanning food photos for nutritional breakdowns. It aims to make calorie counting simple and enjoyable.

Highlights
  • Personalized calorie plans
  • Food photo scanning
  • Nutritional breakdown
  • Calorie deficit tracking
  • Minimalistic design
Features
Read full description

HOW TO USE CALTROPIC: 1) Answer questions to get a personalized plan 2) Take a photo of your food* 3) Get your nutritional breakdown 4) See how many calories are left and enjoy your day! Unlike many other apps, caltropics makes calorie counting enjoyable and frictionless. Uncomplicated, minimalistic, easy to use and scientifically proven. NOTE: We do not offer medical advice. Any and all recommendations should be viewed as suggestions, please consult with a professional and do your own research before trying a new calorie and nutrition plan. *FOOD SCANNING ANALYSIS RESULTS REQUIRE A SUBSCRIPTION. TERMS: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula PRIVACY POLICY: https://sites.google.com/view/fruityhabits-privacypolicy

About

SugarShift

This app helps you break free from sugar cravings by interrupting the moment they hit. In 60 seconds, identify your trigger, complete a breathing reset, and receive a personalized shift to make a healthier choice.

Highlights
  • Real-time craving resets
  • Trigger identification
  • Breathing exercises
  • Pattern insights
  • Progress tracking
  • No calorie counting or restriction
Features
Read full description

You know the moment. The pantry at 9pm. The afternoon slump. The stress that sends you straight to sugar without thinking. SugarShift interrupts that moment before you react. When a craving hits, open the app and tap "I'm Having a Craving." In 60 seconds you'll identify what's actually driving it, complete a short breathing reset, and get one small intentional shift based on your real trigger. This isn't about willpower. It's about creating space to choose. WHAT YOU GET Real-time craving resets when the urge hits Trigger identification: stress, habit, boredom, hunger, and more Breathing reset to calm your nervous system in the moment Pattern insights showing your triggers, timing, and intensity over time Progress tracking as the pause habit builds No calorie counting. No restriction. No guilt. Try free for 3 days. $39.99/year or $4.99/month after trial. Notice. Pause. Shift. Terms of use: https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/

Screenshots

Calorie Tracker4 screens
SugarShift4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is update cadence: Calorie Tracker at every 11 days against SugarShift's every 3 months. Calorie Tracker also leads on ratings volume (5 vs 1). SugarShift's advantage is iOS requirement (15.1 vs 26). On price, rating, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Calorie Tracker sells 11 in-app purchases, starting at $1.99 per 7 days and SugarShift sells 2 in-app purchases, starting at $4.99 per month. Whichever you choose, the download price is not the number that matters.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

On the App Store both sit at effectively the same score — 5.0 for Calorie Tracker against 5.0 for SugarShift. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: Calorie Tracker has 5 ratings behind it against 1, so its average is the more settled of the two.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Calorie Tracker ships an update every 11 days, SugarShift every 3 months. The most recent releases landed on October 28, 2026 and October 2, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
Calorie Tracker versus SugarShift: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterCalorie TrackerSugarShift
PriceFreeFree
Rating5.0 (5 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings)
Positive reviews85.7% of reviews—
Number of ratings5 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 11 days — betterEvery 3 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesYesYes
MonetizationFree with in-app purchasesFree with in-app purchases
DevicesiPhoneiPhone, iPod — better
Requires iOS2615.1 — better
Further details — not scored
Size89 MB37 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperCAN DELIL BOZKURTKimberly Hook

Customer experience

Calorie Tracker

All ratings2 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%
Written reviews14 reviews
Positive85.7%
Neutral7.1%
Negative7.1%

SugarShift

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

11 purchases

Calorie Tracker

Subscriptions11
  • Weekly Premium$1.997 Days
  • Weekly Sale$7.997 Days
  • Monthly Sale$12.991 Month
Show 8 more
  • Yearly Trial$14.991 Year
  • Yearly Sale$19.991 Year
  • Yearly Mid Sale$24.991 Year
  • Yearly Sale Trial$39.991 Year
  • Three Months Trial7 Days trial$39.993 Months
  • Yearly Mid$49.991 Year
  • Three Months Premium7 Days trial$59.993 Months
  • Yearly Premium7 Days trial$71.991 Year
2 purchases

SugarShift

Subscriptions2
  • Premium Monthly$4.991 Month
  • Premium Yearly$39.991 Year

Questions

Is Calorie Tracker free?
Calorie Tracker is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is SugarShift free?
SugarShift is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, Calorie Tracker or SugarShift?
Calorie Tracker and SugarShift are both rated 5.0 out of 5 on the App Store, from 5 and 1 ratings respectively.
Do Calorie Tracker or SugarShift have ads?
Neither Calorie Tracker nor SugarShift shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Calorie Tracker or SugarShift?
Calorie Tracker ships an update every 11 days, and SugarShift every 3 months. Most recently, Calorie Tracker was updated on October 28, 2026 and SugarShift on October 2, 2026.

Other comparisons