WebLike vs 途播
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
WebLike
This browser prioritizes bookmark organization and a comfortable reading environment. It offers a tiled layout for quick access to favorite sites and schemes, ensuring no links are forgotten. Enjoy a more relaxed and pleasant local reading experience.
- Tiled layout for website management
- Elegant bookmark organization
- Enhanced local reading experience
- Scheme management
- Link organization
Read full descriptionHide full description
A highly practical and powerful multimedia content browser. 1. Ultimate tiled bookmark URL management to keep links from ever being neglected. 2. Automatic media detection to quickly identify images, videos, audio files and e-books. 3. Easy management of local movie and video content, with support for video sources including WebDAV, Emby and more. 4. An exceptional experience for reading local e-books. 5. Versatile components to elevate your media content experience to the fullest. End User License Agreement (EULA): https://www.apple.com/legal/internet-services/itunes/dev/stdeula/
途播
This is a straightforward IPTV player that allows you to import and organize your own playlists. It offers quick browsing and playback of live channels with features like channel preview and hardware decoding.
- Supports M3U, M3U8, and TXT playlists
- Import playlists via URL or local files
- Automatic channel name and group parsing
- Channel search, categorization, and favorites
- Channel preview
- System hardware decoding priority
- Dark interface
Read full descriptionHide full description
途播是一款简洁易用的 IPTV 播放器，支持导入和管理你自己的播放列表，快速浏览和播放直播频道。 主要功能： • 支持 M3U、M3U8 和 TXT 播放列表 • 支持通过网址或本地文件导入 • 自动解析频道名称与分组 • 支持频道搜索、分类和收藏 • 频道画面预览 • 系统硬件解码优先 • 支持横屏自动全屏播放 • 简洁直观的深色界面 途播不提供、托管或销售任何频道、节目源及媒体内容。用户应仅导入自己拥有合法访问和使用权限的播放列表，并对所播放内容承担相应责任。 官方网站：https://tubo.pw 联系邮箱：support@tubo.pw
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is ads: WebLike at none against 途播's shown. WebLike also leads on iOS requirement (15.0 vs 17.0). 途播's advantage is review sentiment (76% vs 60%) and update cadence (every 2 days vs every 5 days). On price, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. WebLike sells 1 one-off in-app purchase and 途播 sells 1 one-off in-app purchase. Whichever you choose, the download price is not the number that matters.
WebLike ships an update every 5 days, 途播 every 2 days. Both last shipped on October 12, 2026.
| Parameter | WebLike | 途播 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | — | 4.5 (19 ratings) — better |
| Positive reviews | 60.0% of reviews | 75.7% of reviews — better |
| Number of ratings | — | 19 — better |
| Update frequency | Every 5 days | Every 2 days — better |
| Ads | No — better | Yes |
| In-app purchases | Yes | Yes |
| Monetization | Free with in-app purchases | Free with in-app purchases |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod | iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple TV, Apple Watch — better |
| Requires iOS | 15.0 — better | 17.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 53 MB | 127 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 9+ |
| Developer | 圣臣 刘 | 帅 李 |
Customer experience
WebLike
途播
In-app purchases
WebLike
- Function unlocking$1.99
途播
- 途播 Pro 终身版$4.99
