Look Previews vs CuePulse for Swift
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side ā with what reviewers say about each.
Look Previews
Read full descriptionHide full description
Look is a private photo library app for people who run their own photo server. Connect your iPhone or iPad to a Look server over Tailscale, then browse, search, organize, and inspect your photo archive without moving your library into a public cloud service. Look is built for self-hosted libraries: ⢠Browse a fast, full-screen photo grid ⢠Search by filename, tag, camera metadata, and path ⢠View albums and smart collections from your server ⢠Open photo details with EXIF, dimensions, file type, tags, and location metadata ⢠Long-press photos to enter multi-select ⢠Save selected photos back to your device when you choose ⢠Connect with a Tailscale MagicDNS name or private Tailscale IP address ⢠Use an optional API key when your server requires one Look does not provide cloud photo hosting. You need a running Look server that your device can reach over Tailscale or another trusted private network.
CuePulse for Swift
Read full descriptionHide full description
CuePulse lets iPhone app developers and designers compare sounds and haptics for common interface actions. Tap any cue to hear it. Turn on Haptics to feel the matching pattern on a supported iPhone. Use Play all cues to compare the full collection. Each cue includes Swift code for sound, haptic, and both together. Tap Copy and paste the example into an app that uses the CuePulse Swift package. The app includes fourteen cues for confirmations, errors, toggles, loading, navigation, and other common actions. The sounds are created on the device by the CuePulse package. CuePulse does not require an account. It has no ads or analytics and collects no personal data. CuePulse is based on the original Cuelume sound palette by Daniel Belyi. Both projects use the MIT License.
Screenshots
Verdict
Look Previews and CuePulse for Swift are too close to call on the numbers: across 5 compared parameters ā price, ads, in-app purchases and device support among them ā neither pulls far enough ahead to decide it. What separates them is feature set and interface, not measurable difference.
Scored on Price Ā· Rating Ā· Positive reviews Ā· Number of ratings Ā· Update frequency Ā· Ads Ā· In-app purchases Ā· Monetization Ā· Best chart rank Ā· Devices Ā· Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
| Parameter | Look Previews | CuePulse for Swift |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad ā better | iPhone |
| Requires iOS | 17.0 | 16.0 ā better |
| Further details ā not scored | ||
| Size | 4 MB | 3 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Souranil Sen | Michael Danko |
In-app purchases
Look Previews
No in-app purchases
CuePulse for Swift
No in-app purchases
Questions
Is Look Previews free?
Is CuePulse for Swift free?
Do Look Previews or CuePulse for Swift have ads?
Other comparisons













