Comparison

C172 Performance vs MMOPA

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

C172 Performance

This app calculates essential flight performance data for Cessna 172 and 150 aircraft. It covers takeoff, landing, climb, cruise, descent, instrument procedures, and emergencies, with additional tools for holds and glide calculations. Cloud sync ensures your flight plans are accessible across devices.

Highlights
  • Takeoff and landing calculations
  • Climb, cruise, and descent performance
  • Instrument procedure planning
  • Emergency scenario calculations
  • Interactive hold calculator
  • Emergency glide distance calculator
  • Cloud sync for flight plans
Features
Read full description

C172 Performance computes all the useful performance numbers for flight planning for Cessna model 172 and 150 aircraft. It includes calculations for takeoff, landing, climb, cruise, descent, instrument procedures as well as emergencies. It also includes an interactive hold calculator, a risk analysis tool, and an emergency glide distance calculator that handles head and tailwinds. C172 Performance is also available on other mobile devices and as a WebApp (an App that runs in a browser) that runs on a variety of platforms (PC, Mac, tablets, phones). The cloud sync feature allows flight planning profiles entered on any device to be synchronized with your other devices when connected to the Internet. C172 Performance is a free, open-source development effort and has Apps and WebApps for other aircraft. See http://pohperformance.com for complete details.

About

MMOPA

This tool helps pilots assess flight risks for specific aircraft models. By answering a questionnaire, users receive a risk score and guidance on whether to proceed with a flight, caution, or cancel. It's designed to support proactive hazard identification and better go/no-go decisions.

Highlights
  • Flight risk assessment questionnaire
  • Risk scoring and categorization (Green, Yellow, Red)
  • Risk mitigation guidance
  • Supports PA46 aircraft models
  • Proactive hazard identification
Features
Read full description

The MMOPA Flight Risk Assessment Tool (FRAT) is a tool developed by the Malibu/Mirage Owners and Pilots Association to aid the PA46 pilot community in assessing flight risks unique to the PA46 (Malibu, Matrix Mirage/M350, JetPROP, Meridian/M500, and M600 aircraft). The pilot fills out a questionnaire about their upcoming flight and the MMOPA FRAT provides a score and one of three possible ranges: Green: Lower risk. The pilot/crew should still discuss what the highest scoring risks are and attempt to mitigate those risks. Yellow: Caution. Try to mitigate some of the higher scoring items to reduce risk. If the score is still yellow, the FAA recommends the pilot bring in the opinion of a designated safety person (such as a CFI) to help think of ways to further mitigate risks or cancel the flight. Red: No-go. Unless the risks can be mitigated, the flight is cancelled. The FAA says this about FRAT’s: When implementing a Safety Management System (SMS), one of the most critical components to develop is a Flight Risk Assessment Tool (FRAT). Because every flight has some level of risk, it is critical that pilots are able to differentiate, in advance, between a low risk flight and a high-risk flight, and then establish a review process and develop risk mitigation strategies. A Flight Risk Analysis Tool enables proactive hazard identification, is easy to use, and can visually depict risk. It is an invaluable tool in helping pilots make better go/no-go decisions and should be a part of every flight. The Malibu/Mirage Owners & Pilots Association (MMOPA) is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to the interests and safety of owners and pilots worldwide who fly PA-46 derivative (Malibu, Matrix Mirage/M350, JetPROP, Meridian/M500, and M600 aircraft). MMOPA was founded in 1988, and now serves over 900 members. Membership is available to any registered or prospective owner and/or operator of qualified aircraft or any qualifying individual or organization involved with or providing a service for the PA-46 family of aircraft. MMOPA is not affiliated with the New Piper aircraft company of any other manufacturer/vendor. For information on MMOPA, please visit: http://www.mmopa.com For general information about FRAT's in general, please visit: https://www.faasafety.gov/files/gslac/library/documents/2015/Jun/103321/Introducing%20FAAST%20FRAT.pdf

Screenshots

C172 Performance4 screens
MMOPA3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is ads: MMOPA at none against C172 Performance's shown. MMOPA also leads on monetization model (free vs ad-supported) and iOS requirement (9.0 vs 13.0). C172 Performance's advantage is rating (4.9 vs 4.5) and review sentiment (90% vs 75%). On price, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

C172 Performance holds the better App Store score, 4.9 against 4.5. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 52 and 11 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 90% of C172 Performance's written reviews are positive against 75% of MMOPA's.

Scorecard6 real differences · 4 level
C172 Performance versus MMOPA: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterC172 PerformanceMMOPA
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.9 (52 ratings) — better4.5 (11 ratings)
Positive reviews90.0% of reviews — better75.0% of reviews
Number of ratings52 — better11
Update frequencyEvery 2 months—
AdsYesNo — better
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationAd-supportedFree — better
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS13.09.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size15 MB19 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperPOH Performance L.L.C.InfoPogo

Customer experience

C172 Performance

All ratings52 ratings
Positive98.1%
Neutral0.0%
Negative1.9%
Written reviews30 reviews
Positive90.0%
Neutral3.3%
Negative6.7%

MMOPA

All ratings11 ratings
Positive90.9%
Neutral0.0%
Negative9.1%
Written reviews4 reviews
Positive75.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative25.0%

In-app purchases

None

C172 Performance

No in-app purchases

None

MMOPA

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is C172 Performance free?
C172 Performance is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is MMOPA free?
MMOPA is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, C172 Performance or MMOPA?
C172 Performance is rated higher. C172 Performance averages 4.9 out of 5 from 52 ratings, while MMOPA averages 4.5 from 11 ratings.
Do C172 Performance or MMOPA have ads?
C172 Performance shows ads; MMOPA does not.

Other comparisons