Mi vs JumpCloud Protect
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
Mi
This business application enables rapid, secure, and cost-effective deployment of soft-tokens to users. It generates useful One-Time Passwords (OTPs) and automatically uses corrected time for generation.
- Soft-token deployment
- Rapid user deployment
- Secure deployment
- Cost-effective deployment
- One-Time Password (OTP) generation
- Automatic corrected time usage
Read full descriptionHide full description
Mi-Token Soft-Token application provides customers with the capability of deploying soft-tokens to a multitude of users rapidly, securely and cost-effectively. The application provides a preview of its functionality and styling when not loaded with data, and produces a useful OTP (One-Time Password) when loaded. The application allows for automatic use of corrected time when generating OTPs.
JumpCloud Protect
Securely access your work accounts with multi-factor authentication. This app provides an extra layer of security through push notifications or time-based one-time passwords, offering a more robust and user-friendly alternative to SMS codes.
- Multi-factor authentication (MFA)
- Push notification verification
- Time-based one-time password (TOTP)
- Enhanced security over SMS codes
- Offline TOTP functionality
Read full descriptionHide full description
Sign into your work resources simply and securely with the JumpCloud Protect® mobile application, proud winner of the Globee Cybersecurity Award. JumpCloud Protect enables multi-factor authentication (MFA) which ensures user verification. MFA provides an extra layer of security beyond traditional username and password authentication through either a push notification or a verification code through TOTP (time-based one-time password). Both methods are easier to use and provide more security than user-created passcodes or authentication codes sent via SMS. In addition, TOTP does not require your mobile device to be connected to Wi-Fi or a cellular network.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is review sentiment: JumpCloud Protect at 47% against Mi's 0%. JumpCloud Protect also leads on update cadence (fortnightly vs every 12 months) and ratings volume (32 vs 6). Mi's advantage is rating (4.5 vs 4.3) and iOS requirement (8.0 vs 17.6). On price, ads, in-app purchases and monetization model there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
Mi holds the better App Store score, 4.5 against 4.3. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: JumpCloud Protect has 32 ratings behind it against 6, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews complicate that: 0% of Mi's written reviews are positive against 47% of JumpCloud Protect's, so the app with the better star average is not the one people write more warmly about.
Mi ships an update every 12 months, JumpCloud Protect fortnightly. The most recent releases landed on June 8, 2026 and September 24, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | Mi | JumpCloud Protect |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 4.5 (6 ratings) — better | 4.3 (32 ratings) |
| Positive reviews | 0.0% of reviews | 47.1% of reviews — better |
| Number of ratings | 6 | 32 — better |
| Update frequency | Every 12 months | Fortnightly — better |
| Ads | No | No |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free | Free |
| Devices | iPhone, iPod | iPhone, iPad |
| Requires iOS | 8.0 — better | 17.6 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 1 MB | 81 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Mi-Token Inc. | JumpCloud |
Customer experience
Mi
JumpCloud Protect
In-app purchases
Mi
No in-app purchases
JumpCloud Protect
No in-app purchases
