Comparison

e签宝 vs 契约锁电子签约

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

e签宝

Provides reliable electronic signature services based on Chinese law, offering a complete ecosystem for document signing, management, and legal evidence preservation. It streamlines document signing, reduces costs, and enhances file management efficiency for businesses.

Highlights
  • Electronic signature for various data formats
  • Online contract drafting and approval
  • Document archiving and management
  • Third-party electronic data preservation
  • Legal compliance and certification
  • Template services and custom solutions
Features
Read full description

e签宝基于《中华人民共和国电子签名法》提供可靠电子签名服务,是全国领先的第三方电子签名服务提供商,是中国第三方电子签名平台行业的鼻祖。从电子签名到文档归档管理,从签名数据存证到司法出证,e签宝提供了一套完整的电子签名生态服务,大大提升了文件签署效率,节约文件流转成本,实现文书电子化,提升文件管理效率,完善的证据存取服务和后续司法服务,让企业快速建立信任,避免后顾之忧。 # 功能介绍 1. 电子签名:支持包括版式文件、流式文件、数据流等不同电子数据形态的签署 2. 文件管理:可实现合同在线拟定、审批流转、合同存管、印章管理授权、模板服务、行业场景定制接入等服务; 3. 存证保全:e签宝联合公证处、司法鉴定、仲裁委等权威机构,共同打造取证、存证、出证为一体的第三方电子数据保全平台; 4. 合法合规:e签宝电子签名服务完全符合国家相关法律规定,并成功获得国密局、公安部的认证,权威司法鉴定中心为e签宝系统进行技术评估,为e签宝用户开通电子证据鉴定的专用绿色通道。

About

契约锁电子签约

Features
Read full description

契约锁提供一体化的产品服务,系统性帮助组织解决各类用印需求,提升组织的用章效率和合法合规性! 【实体印章和电子签章一体化授权管理】 传统的实体印章和电子化签约及数据存证完美结合,在契约锁上即可管理实物印章也可管理电子印章;通过契约锁统一的印控中心,对各类印章授权管理,不管是实体印章还是电子印章都在安全授权的情况下使用。 【电子印章和实体印章防伪打印机结合】 融入物联网技术,通过智能硬件和软件结合,把实体印章和电子印章防伪打印机管控起来,只有通过授权才能使用印章和打印盖章文件。 【保证文件数据私密性及安全性】 采用混合云的方式,数据保存在组织内部保证签约数据的私有性、安全性,契约锁保存签约过程、修改痕迹以及电子认证等第三方存证记录。 【保证印章的使用安全】 契约锁通过智能硬件、软件加密和电子身份认证多重安全防护,确保印章使用安全、合规、有效和便捷。 【随时随地移动签署】 所有印章都可以装入到你的手机,出差在全球任何地方都可以随时授权指令实物印章的使用和监控。 【公有云、私有云及混合云部署方案】 提供多种软硬件结合实施方案,不管是大规模企业、中小规模企业和政府都可以合理配置,快速实施。

Screenshots

e签宝4 screens
契约锁电子签约4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is review sentiment: e签宝 at 83% against 契约锁电子签约's 13%. e签宝 also leads on iOS requirement (13.0 vs 15.0). 契约锁电子签约's advantage is in-app purchases (none vs 8). On price, update cadence, ads and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. e签宝 sells 8 one-off in-app purchases. 契约锁电子签约 asks for nothing beyond the download.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly fortnightly. The most recent releases landed on September 10, 2026 and September 21, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard3 real differences · 7 level
e签宝 versus 契约锁电子签约: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parametere签宝契约锁电子签约
PriceFreeFree
Rating2.9 (7 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews83.3% of reviews — better12.5% of reviews
Number of ratings7 — better—
Update frequencyFortnightlyFortnightly
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesYesNo — better
MonetizationFree with in-app purchases—
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS13.0 — better15.0
Further details — not scored
Size46 MB68 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperHangzhou Timevale Information Technology Co., Ltd.Shanghai Genyan Network Technology Co., Ltd.

Customer experience

e签宝

All ratings7 ratings
Positive42.9%
Neutral0.0%
Negative57.1%
Written reviews24 reviews
Positive83.3%
Neutral0.0%
Negative16.7%

契约锁电子签约

Written reviews8 reviews
Positive12.5%
Neutral12.5%
Negative75.0%

In-app purchases

8 purchases

e签宝

One-time8
  • test contract 6RMB$0.99
  • 内部测试套餐2$0.99
  • 6元套餐$0.99
Show 5 more
  • SaaS签署流量包12份$1.99
  • (Apple专用)签署流量包 1份 电子签名流量(组合)$1.99
  • (Apple专用)签署流量包1份$1.99
  • SaaS测试流量包30份-sml$4.99
  • SaaS签署流量包10份$9.99
None

契约锁电子签约

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is e签宝 free?
e签宝 is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Is 契约锁电子签约 free?
契约锁电子签约 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Do e签宝 or 契约锁电子签约 have ads?
Neither e签宝 nor 契约锁电子签约 shows ads.
Which is updated more often, e签宝 or 契约锁电子签约?
e签宝 ships an update fortnightly, and 契约锁电子签约 fortnightly. Most recently, e签宝 was updated on September 10, 2026 and 契约锁电子签约 on September 21, 2026.

Other comparisons