Homeschooling
Great for additional learning and fun with 9+ kids in homeschooling.
Brilliant for aspiring creatives
So much to learn and the courses are always very reasonably priced and often discounted.
Deceptive Sales
Poor Quality Courses. Zero Customer Service. Deceptive Sales Tactic.
This company will make you sign up for an annual subscription that costs over $200 when trying to enroll for a single course.
Here’s how the scam works:
They will offer you the first month for less than $1 as a trial. After that period, they will charge you the whole sum for the annual subscription. They will not send you any e-mails prior to the end of the trial period and THEY DO NOT ALLOW REFUNDS. They do not respond to e-mails either.
The courses are all beginner levels. Nothing but introductory topics. You will not learn anything unless you are a child with zero knowledge about the world. Youtube offers free courses that are way better than anything here in this app.
Most courses in this app are made by outsourced instructors that do not speak in English, definitely for cheap labor. You’d have to rely on English subtitles that are again, also outsourced, done by foreigners who has horribly heavy accents with no hint of fluency in English.
This company will make you sign up for an annual subscription that costs over $200 when trying to enroll for a single course.
Here’s how the scam works:
They will offer you the first month for less than $1 as a trial. After that period, they will charge you the whole sum for the annual subscription. They will not send you any e-mails prior to the end of the trial period and THEY DO NOT ALLOW REFUNDS. They do not respond to e-mails either.
The courses are all beginner levels. Nothing but introductory topics. You will not learn anything unless you are a child with zero knowledge about the world. Youtube offers free courses that are way better than anything here in this app.
Most courses in this app are made by outsourced instructors that do not speak in English, definitely for cheap labor. You’d have to rely on English subtitles that are again, also outsourced, done by foreigners who has horribly heavy accents with no hint of fluency in English.
Show more
Minhas mãos são muito especiais e abençoadas
Os cursos que a Domestika oferece são uns verdadeiros tesouros para o artesão
Unfair refund policy and action
This company has a 14-day refund policy for its products, and I have always submitted my refund requests within the stated refund period. My requests are made for genuine reasons, particularly when I find that a product is lacking in quality, and I make sure to follow the company’s stated refund policy and its requirements.
What is particularly concerning is that, despite following their refund policy, I was apparently reported to Apple for allegedly misusing the refund system. As a result, Apple has stopped accepting refund requests from me for other applications and products hosted on App store. This has had a significant impact on me.
I am currently enrolled in around 70+ courses with this company. I have made a substantial investment in their products, and it is extremely disappointing to find myself facing restrictions on Apple’s refund system because I exercised the company’s own refund policy for products that I genuinely considered to be of poor quality.
When I contacted the company, I was told that I was allegedly misusing their refund policy. However, when I spoke to their customer support representatives, they denied having made such a claim or complaint to Apple. This contradiction is extremely frustrating and raises serious concerns about the transparency of their communication and how my case has been handled.
If a company offers a 14-day refund policy, customers should be able to rely on that policy without being penalized for legitimately exercising it. If a product is genuinely poor in quality and a customer requests a refund within the stated timeframe, there should be no reason to characterize that customer as abusing the system.
I find the company’s handling of this situation deeply unfair and lacking in transparency. The consequences have extended beyond this company and have affected my ability to request refunds through Apple’s system for other products as well.
Domestika should stand behind the refund policies they publish. Customers should not be effectively blacklisted or have their access to legitimate refund mechanisms restricted simply because they exercised a clearly stated refund policy in good faith.
What is particularly concerning is that, despite following their refund policy, I was apparently reported to Apple for allegedly misusing the refund system. As a result, Apple has stopped accepting refund requests from me for other applications and products hosted on App store. This has had a significant impact on me.
I am currently enrolled in around 70+ courses with this company. I have made a substantial investment in their products, and it is extremely disappointing to find myself facing restrictions on Apple’s refund system because I exercised the company’s own refund policy for products that I genuinely considered to be of poor quality.
When I contacted the company, I was told that I was allegedly misusing their refund policy. However, when I spoke to their customer support representatives, they denied having made such a claim or complaint to Apple. This contradiction is extremely frustrating and raises serious concerns about the transparency of their communication and how my case has been handled.
If a company offers a 14-day refund policy, customers should be able to rely on that policy without being penalized for legitimately exercising it. If a product is genuinely poor in quality and a customer requests a refund within the stated timeframe, there should be no reason to characterize that customer as abusing the system.
I find the company’s handling of this situation deeply unfair and lacking in transparency. The consequences have extended beyond this company and have affected my ability to request refunds through Apple’s system for other products as well.
Domestika should stand behind the refund policies they publish. Customers should not be effectively blacklisted or have their access to legitimate refund mechanisms restricted simply because they exercised a clearly stated refund policy in good faith.
Show more
