A melhor IA até o momento
Nota 10
Uso indevido os créditos
Meus créditos foram consumidos sem minha autorização.
Love it!
If I have a personal assistant, a business assistant, he’s 16 employees also exactly what I want then any questions or any hiccups it’s amazing if people aren’t using this or they’re absolutely crazy
安かろう悪かろう
たしかに便利ではある。なぜ便利なのかを理解して使用するべき。要は中間業者を介してAIを使っている事になり、データはほぼ学習に使われ機密性などないと思ったほうがいい。たとえ使用するAI側が学習しないと言ってても、gensparkを介した時点でそれは無意味になる。しかもこのアプリの開発には大手の中国企業が関わっています。賢い方ならそれがどんなに危険か分かりますよね。ですがそのあたりを理解して使用するならば、アリだと思います。
When AI Video Production Becomes a Credit Trap
I had high expectations for Genspark because, when it works, it can produce genuinely professional-looking videos. Unfortunately, my experience has become frustrating enough that I cannot recommend the service.
The biggest problem is not the price. I am perfectly willing to pay for professional video production. The problem is paying credits for a finished product and then discovering that the product was not delivered properly.
I have had videos where the audio and visuals were not synchronized correctly. I have had completed videos that I could not download. When I asked Genspark to correct problems with work I had already paid credits to generate, I was then asked to spend additional credits.
That is unacceptable.
My latest experience was even worse. I requested a professional video and Genspark produced a 7-minute-and-33-second video filled with generic bubble-style animation that had almost nothing to do with the subject being discussed, while the narration was covering something completely different. The disconnect between what I was hearing and what I was watching made the video practically useless.
This wasn’t a minor creative disagreement. The visuals simply did not support the narration.
And once again, after paying for the generation, the process of getting problems corrected or simply getting a usable downloadable product risks consuming even more credits.
At that point, the credit system starts to feel like a trap: pay to generate, discover a production defect, then potentially pay again just to receive what should have been delivered correctly the first time.
I am not asking Genspark to work for free. I am asking them to stand behind the product customers already paid for.
If a customer changes the script, requests a new creative direction, or asks for additional work, charging additional credits is completely reasonable.
But if the video has synchronization problems, irrelevant visuals, rendering defects, or cannot be downloaded, correcting those defects should not require the customer to purchase the production again.
Genspark has impressive technology and is capable of producing beautiful videos. That actually makes this experience more disappointing. A company with this level of technology needs better quality control, reliable downloads, and a fair correction policy.
Until that changes, I would be extremely cautious about using Genspark for serious professional video production—especially when each failed attempt can become another expensive credit charge.
The biggest problem is not the price. I am perfectly willing to pay for professional video production. The problem is paying credits for a finished product and then discovering that the product was not delivered properly.
I have had videos where the audio and visuals were not synchronized correctly. I have had completed videos that I could not download. When I asked Genspark to correct problems with work I had already paid credits to generate, I was then asked to spend additional credits.
That is unacceptable.
My latest experience was even worse. I requested a professional video and Genspark produced a 7-minute-and-33-second video filled with generic bubble-style animation that had almost nothing to do with the subject being discussed, while the narration was covering something completely different. The disconnect between what I was hearing and what I was watching made the video practically useless.
This wasn’t a minor creative disagreement. The visuals simply did not support the narration.
And once again, after paying for the generation, the process of getting problems corrected or simply getting a usable downloadable product risks consuming even more credits.
At that point, the credit system starts to feel like a trap: pay to generate, discover a production defect, then potentially pay again just to receive what should have been delivered correctly the first time.
I am not asking Genspark to work for free. I am asking them to stand behind the product customers already paid for.
If a customer changes the script, requests a new creative direction, or asks for additional work, charging additional credits is completely reasonable.
But if the video has synchronization problems, irrelevant visuals, rendering defects, or cannot be downloaded, correcting those defects should not require the customer to purchase the production again.
Genspark has impressive technology and is capable of producing beautiful videos. That actually makes this experience more disappointing. A company with this level of technology needs better quality control, reliable downloads, and a fair correction policy.
Until that changes, I would be extremely cautious about using Genspark for serious professional video production—especially when each failed attempt can become another expensive credit charge.
Show more
Service client
Bravo, je suis fan ce que je voudrais, c’est qu’on vous explique un petit peu plus en détail les fonctions, mais vraiment c’est mon application favori pour le boulot, bravo, continue à développer l’application et bravo à toute l’équipe de Genspark
I LOVE
LOVE
年間40,000円のプラスプランに加入しましたが、三日間でクレジットを使い切ってしまいました。が
タイトルの通り三日間でクレジットがゼロになってしまいました。27時間以内ならキャンセルしてもお金が発生しないとの事だったのですが、どうも間に合わずに、来年の4月18日まではプラスプランが使えるようですが、クレジットがゼロのため単純なカレンダーやリマインドへの指示もできず、もちろん電話代行も使えない状態です。おそらくもっと上位プランなら可能なのでしょうが、自分にとっては年間40,000円の料金が高い割にはできる仕事（成果物）が少ない感じがします。
しかも、１９日にクレジット復活を確認したのち、「バックグラウンドで作業していますか？」の答えに対して、「いいえバックグラウンドでは作業していません。」との答えが、数日たって、6000クレジット、また数日開けて確認すると0クレジットでした。
これは何かの詐欺ではないかと感じました。
消費者庁か何かに問い合わせをしようかとも思っています。
サポート体制が不明瞭で、不親切です。
Gensparkはディープリサーチした後の成果物がとっても気に入っているのですが、本当にお金に余裕がある人にお勧めします。
＊追伸になります。
何の不具合だったのか、上記のクレジットの消耗は解消されています。
しかも、１９日にクレジット復活を確認したのち、「バックグラウンドで作業していますか？」の答えに対して、「いいえバックグラウンドでは作業していません。」との答えが、数日たって、6000クレジット、また数日開けて確認すると0クレジットでした。
これは何かの詐欺ではないかと感じました。
消費者庁か何かに問い合わせをしようかとも思っています。
サポート体制が不明瞭で、不親切です。
Gensparkはディープリサーチした後の成果物がとっても気に入っているのですが、本当にお金に余裕がある人にお勧めします。
＊追伸になります。
何の不具合だったのか、上記のクレジットの消耗は解消されています。
Show more
Complicated project
Fantastic multi stream capable project ready Ai. Now linked with the second brain, when examines multiple chat sources and returns valuable well structured results to keep projects focused and on track
Перестал генерировать
Проверьте приложение. Исправьте баги.
코인이 많이 들어서 그렇지 좋습니다.
PPT만들기나 영상편집등의 도움을 받으려면 코인이 좀 많이 듭니다. 하지만 도움을 요청한 사항이나 지시사항에 대해서는 아주 완성도 높은 결과물을 보여줍니다. 다만, 질문의 내용이 자세하지 않거나 자세하더라도 AI가 이해하기 좀 난해한 부분이 있으면 버벅이는 경우가 있는데, 버벅인 답변도 코인을 소비하기 때문에 간혹 곤란할때가 있으니 주의요망
Game changer
Great app. Great on desktop too. This ai is forward thinking. Don’t forget to keep context window as small as possible.
Limited
Taken off you almost essential tools like edit or delete chat or photos you provided and doesn’t let you act unless you upgrade.. it’s a rip off
Number 1
Genspark is the best all in one Ai app on the market. It’s not even close. If you only have a couple Ai apps, you are not only wasting money but missing out because Genspark takes all the best Ai companies and combines them to one place. I highly recommend…
Genspark AI
Top zufrieden, top AI ❤️
Excelente
Muito bom, pena que é um pouco caro
Muito bom
Excelente
O melhor
Top
Best ever
This is the best AI I’ve ever used
Gracias
Genspark eres de lo mejor
