Please add 20/400
Response from developer
But if John the patient can not see 20/200, isn't he already legally blind. Nevertheless, you can still test 20/400. For example, change the app's test distance to 10 feet, but actually test at 20 feet with an optotype of 20/200, the largest the app can display.
Solid app
Response from developer
Are you suggesting to have multiple rows? or you want to 2 meters test distance? I am aware that doctors have been using the app in wards. Shall we have a conversation by Email? please send to s AT Fonlow dot com or just use the app's "Send Message to Developer" feature.
Please add 20/400
Response from developer
But if John the patient can not see 20/200, isn't he already legally blind. Nevertheless, you can still test 20/400. For example, change the app's test distance to 10 feet, but actually test at 20 feet with an optotype of 20/200, the largest the app can display.
不显示字符高度....................
Response from developer
仅在更改大小时出现一次。 尺寸供参考, 供你验证此App 很准确,当用把尺度量时。 您是阅读了视标以测试您的视力。 Appear once only when changing size. The size is only for reference. You read Optotype for testing your eyesight.
没办法自定义距离
Response from developer
您需要按键盘上的Enter确认更改。 这适用于需要输入数字的所有应用，这些应用由iOS的UI基本行为定义。 You need to press the Enter in the keypad to confirm the change. This applies to all apps that need number input, defined by the UI basic behavior of iOS.
很不准确
Response from developer
6米的默认起始VA分数是0.32，而5米的默认起始VA分数是0.25。 如果VA分数相同，则6米处的视标大于5米处的视标。视标高度决定于距离和视力读数。 随机性基于每次应用程序的重启，因此对于每个最多每周进行一次测试的患者来说，随机性就足够了。 The default start VA score for 6 meter is 0.32, while the default start VA score for 5 meter is 0.25. If the same VA score, optotype at 6 meter is larger than optotype at 5 meter. The size of optotype is determined by distance and VA score. The randomness is based on each app start, so it is random enough for each patient who may take a test at most weekly.
Paid $5 for there to be no shapes!!
Response from developer
It was designed for children older than 6 as described in the app description. You may ask App Store for refund.
Well written app
So far so good
Updated
It looks promising
Response from developer
Testing amblyopia requires more than just multiple optotypes in one row of an eye chart which may test lazy eyes roughly. Nevertheless, having multiple optotypes in one row is in the roadmap of this app.
ipad显示同尺寸明显比iphone大一点
Response from developer
Update: v2.3已发布，该版本应支持iPad 10.2英寸第七代。v2.3 is published, which should support iPad 10.2 inch 7th generation. ========================================= The adjustment should be automatic. Which iPad model do you have? 调整应该是自动的。 您有哪种iPad型号？iPad Pro 2020 (4th Generation)?
This was free - now it’s not.
================
Update: If it was just a temporary 1 week free trial, why not extend that for several more weeks to help people out? Or maybe reduce the price to $0.99? Seems like that would be reasonable if you are restricted from changing it to free.
================
Hundreds of patients will now suffer as they can’t afford spending money on a single visual acuity check. Shame on the developer for taking advantage of the disadvantaged. Hold down on the comment and like it so it rises to the top of most helpful. Time to look for another option.
Response from developer
App Store does NOT allow a free app to become a paid app, and this app has been a paid app. And you may request a refund from App Store. There had been a 1 week promotion during which the purchase price was zero.
What’s the point?
Response from developer
The app has been a paid app since day 1, and App Store does NOT allow a free app to become a paid app. There had been a 1 week promotion during which the purchase price was zero.
In times of need
Response from developer
The app has been a paid app since day 1, and App Store does NOT allow a free app to become a paid app. There had been a 1 week promotion during which the purchase price was zero.
Profiting off of a virus
Pretty bad and lacking human decency
Response from developer
The app has been a paid app since day 1, and App Store does NOT allow a free app to become a paid app. There had been a 1 week promotion during which the purchase price was zero.
Unconscionable
Response from developer
The app has been a paid app since day 1, and App Store does NOT allow a free app to become a paid app. There had been a 1 week promotion during which the purchase price was zero.
Insolidarios
Dicho esto no está validada no e equivalente Y cambia con el tamaño del dispositivo móvil
Shame on you for profiteering during COVID pandemic!
Response from developer
The app has been a paid app since day 1, and App Store does NOT allow a free app to become a paid app. There had been a 1 week promotion during which the purchase price was zero.
