Changed Leaderboard Prize money mid month
I was working hard to climb the leaderboard and was on track for $200 but mid month they decide to cut the prize pool in half so that you have to top 2 to get more than $20. It was fun while lasted but I do not recommend as they made it impossible to make actual money. I feel taken advantage of and I would like the leaderboard reverted to how it was for the first 2 weeks.
Show more
BBB72681
Arbitrary constraints
The app gives you 5 seconds to read, process, and think of a counter point and you only have a minute to respond on a very complex, layered, and dense topic. That’s not very honest or helpful. And also, why does it pick topics for you? I got a sports topic and I don’t care about sports unless I actually participate in those sports. At least give an option for a longer debate format and an option for picking the topic. Not for RNG and the arbitrary timer format. This app doesn’t help thinking. It’s more like a game. It doesn’t teach people how to talk. It just teaches people how to jump around and reply. Anyone can do that easily. If you’re serious about dialogue, skip this app.
TL;DR: I would give this app a -1 star if it were possible.
TL;DR: I would give this app a -1 star if it were possible.
Show more
杭杭阿强
How the app works
Most of the Ai say the same stuff over and over again and there’s barely and real people to debate.there also isn’t enough time to rebuke or make an argument, I always lose because I’m stopped halfway through my argument.
APAdd guns pleeeeeeaaase
Needs work
Decent app but the AI needs a lot of work. It will straw man a lot and that makes the debates get off topic. It also says things that are easily disproven, but it'll just repeat itself and that makes the arguments also get off track. And then at the end the judge grades you both poorly for being "too repetitive" when you kept having to correct the AI.
Also, how the AI judge thinks about evidence is kind of confusing to me. You can state a fact like "most of X are Y" like stating a majority. But it's not counted as evidence even though you could google the claim and it's true that a majority of X and are Y. It's kind of hard to find and cite extremely specific data or examples when you have 45 seconds and you don't wanna be dishonest or wrong.
I also feel like the AI seems like a very cliche version of the philosophers. Obviously I know they can't dig up the philosophers themselves. But my point is that often times the AI could easily have made a better argument but it sticks to quoting things from the philosopher, even if it's not serving them.
They should add a mode that's longer
Also, how the AI judge thinks about evidence is kind of confusing to me. You can state a fact like "most of X are Y" like stating a majority. But it's not counted as evidence even though you could google the claim and it's true that a majority of X and are Y. It's kind of hard to find and cite extremely specific data or examples when you have 45 seconds and you don't wanna be dishonest or wrong.
I also feel like the AI seems like a very cliche version of the philosophers. Obviously I know they can't dig up the philosophers themselves. But my point is that often times the AI could easily have made a better argument but it sticks to quoting things from the philosopher, even if it's not serving them.
They should add a mode that's longer
Show more
Hhdjejshdjes
I like it but I needs some updates….
Like I said, I like it, but I need some updates. Like 45 seconds just to write out your opinion is not enough time by far. I think the least should be a minute and 30 at LEAST. Also, the thinking time should be longer and they should be spending most of their money towards advertising and marketing with popular debaters to get more people on the app since you can’t even debate anyone because no one else is on this app. Other than that, it’s very well designed and I like the feel and look of the app and it was a very good idea.
Show more
FFin83737
