Trendspark has limited verification signals. The AppsHunter Legitimacy Score for Trendspark is 58 out of 100 points across 7 verification signals from App Store and developer data.

Trendspark Reviews: Is It Legit?

Name: Trendspark
Rating: 3.4 (14 reviews)

Trendspark

TRENDSPARK AI, LLC

🎬 Entertainment

🌐 Social Networking

Is Trendspark Safe?

Not enough ratings yet to assess Trendspark.

Is Trendspark Legit?

Trendspark has limited verification signals. AppsHunter Legitimacy Score for Trendspark is 58/100.

Based on 58 of 100 points across 7 verification signals from App Store and developer data.

Top reviews

Most Recent Highest Rated Lowest Rated

If you want to improve your debating skills, this is a great tool

10/10

Samrsanche

20 days ago

Not great

As a person with two bachelors degrees, one being in political science, I feel particularly sufficient in greeting this sort of app after several debates. First of all when you debate the AI, it goes off-topic all the time. Despite this, the after debate review often lies towards the AI. The amount of time allotted per section is very poor, 45 seconds to write an opinion on a nuance political issue is matching of our current system where we want people to have an opinion on everything without being nuanced. These are complicated issues and especially when writing you need more times than 45 seconds for an opening opinion. I think debates should probably be age bracketed, or at least by option. I may be egotistical, but I with my experience don’t feel like debating an 18-year-old who hasn’t even graduated high school and has not had the time to properly develop opinions on these issues. Lastly, the 18-year-old was the only person I was able to find to debate, the app is dead or dying, and doesn’t have sufficient participants to debate. There are some in app glitches too, for example, when you’re done, debating the AI you have to click the button quit on the top Left, but you’re not able to scroll to actually tap it. You can only see it but it’s not interactive. You have to reload the app reload the debate and then you can quit just open a new debate. Huge waste of time.

This is the only time I’ve ever wrote a review for anything.

👎

Mmason___

21 days ago

Response from developer

Hi Mason, thank you for taking the time to leave such detailed feedback. We’re sorry your experience with Trendspark was frustrating. The app only recently launched, so our user base is still growing, which can make it difficult to find available opponents at certain times. We really appreciate your feedback about the debate timers, AI responses and scoring, matchmaking, and the issue you experienced when trying to exit an AI debate. Feedback like this helps us identify what needs improvement, and we’ll be taking these points into consideration as we continue updating the app. Thank you again for giving Trendspark a try, and we’re sorry we weren’t able to provide the experience you were hoping for. - The Trendspark Team

Not very good

When I was debating, it was against an AI in the main thing with it was that every single time I had tried to stir the topic a little bit towards the main topic. It would go back towards a different one and then a rated mind saying I was repetitive even though I was trying to push different sub topics but the AI kept trying to stick to something that I already disproved the app could definitely get better and I could definitely see this work out better but the thing is I think the AI just didn’t work that well. I would love to see this app in like 1 to 2 years

Definitely 1.0

21 days ago

Response from developer

Thank you for the thoughtful feedback. We’re sorry the AI kept pulling the debate away from the points you were trying to make and that the scoring felt unfair as a result. Improving the AI’s ability to follow different arguments and subtopics is something we’re continuing to work on. We really appreciate you seeing the potential in the app, and hopefully we can earn you back a lot sooner than 1–2 years from now! - The Trendspark Team

Fun

I enjoyed being able to debate AI philosophers I thought that was a really cool feature. I also liked the fact I could debate my friends 1 on 1.

uapr

22 days ago

Cool app

This has replaced doom scrolling for me

Tmrwrainsm&ms

22 days ago

Interesting Idea

I like the concept and its nice to be able to win some cash without having to deposit any

Seanmoroue

22 days ago

Meh

I did a few debates and they were all against AI since no one is on the app. Apparently every argument lacks depth and specific examples..despite me specifically adding in examples to see if the AI’s analysis would change. It could just be a skill issue, but I think it is an issue with the AI when it constantly ranks itself better for nonsensical reasons. You also have a very short time to type, so depth is difficult no matter what. Plus the UI is broken to the point where you have to reload the app after most debates to go anywhere. Interesting idea, but hard to feel like it is actually rating performance and not just saying the right points and examples it wanted. It doesn’t seem to promote solid debating tactics since the AI consistently would just repeat their point with “yeah but” statements and win every time. Even if I won more often, it feels like it isn’t a game of skill and I’d be skeptical of why.

Kyschil

a month ago

Response from developer

Thank you for the detailed feedback. We completely understand the frustration, especially when you’re giving specific examples and still receiving feedback that your arguments lack depth. We’re currently making changes to both the debate AI and the judging system to improve how arguments are understood, scored, and compared, and to reduce repetitive or unfair-feeling results. We’re also working on UI issues and reviewing the debate time limits. We really appreciate you giving the app a chance and pointing these issues out—it helps us improve Trendspark much faster. - The Trendspark Team