Comparison

FC SmartHome vs eSmartLock

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

FC SmartHome

Manage your home's intelligent devices remotely through a mobile app. Control door locks and other smart devices from anywhere to start a smarter life.

Highlights
  • Intelligent device management
  • Remote control of home door locks
  • Control other intelligent devices
  • Anytime, anywhere access
  • Start a smart life
Features
Read full description

FCSmartHome is your family intelligent device management platform, easy to control the home door locks and other intelligent devices through mobile phone App, remote control at anytime and anywhere. FCSmartHome to help you start a smart life.

About

eSmartLock

Control your smart locks remotely and eliminate the need for traditional keys. This app offers a convenient way to manage access and avoid the hassle of lost keys.

Highlights
  • Smart lock mobile client
  • Keyless entry
  • Remote lock control
  • Eliminate traditional keys
  • Avoid lost key hassle
Features
Read full description

eSmartLock is a smart lock mobile client software, which is close to life. Get rid of the constraints of traditional keys and avoid the hassle of losing keys.

Screenshots

FC SmartHome3 screens
eSmartLock4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: eSmartLock at 2.3 against FC SmartHome's 1.7. eSmartLock also leads on review sentiment (32% vs 8%) and ratings volume (159 vs 15). FC SmartHome's advantage is in-app purchases (none vs 3) and iOS requirement (9.0 vs 13.0). On price, update cadence, ads and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. eSmartLock sells 3 one-off in-app purchases. FC SmartHome asks for nothing beyond the download.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

eSmartLock holds the better App Store score, 2.3 against 1.7. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: eSmartLock has 159 ratings behind it against 15, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 8% of FC SmartHome's written reviews are positive against 32% of eSmartLock's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Both ship on a similar rhythm, roughly every 2 months. The most recent releases landed on June 1, 2026 and September 26, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard6 real differences · 4 level
FC SmartHome versus eSmartLock: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterFC SmartHomeeSmartLock
PriceFreeFree
Rating1.7 (15 ratings)2.3 (159 ratings) — better
Positive reviews8.3% of reviews31.8% of reviews — better
Number of ratings15159 — better
Update frequencyEvery 2 monthsEvery 2 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
MonetizationFree — betterFree with in-app purchases
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPod, Apple Watch — better
Requires iOS9.0 — better13.0
Further details — not scored
Size62 MB66 MB
Age rating4++4
DeveloperShenzhen Zhixin Wulian Technology Co., Ltd.Shenzhen Elink Smart Co., Ltd.

Customer experience

FC SmartHome

All ratings15 ratings
Positive6.7%
Neutral20.0%
Negative73.3%
Written reviews12 reviews
Positive8.3%
Neutral16.7%
Negative75.0%

eSmartLock

All ratings159 ratings
Positive27.7%
Neutral7.5%
Negative64.8%
Written reviews148 reviews
Positive31.8%
Neutral8.1%
Negative60.1%

Bugs and requests

FC SmartHome

Not enough reviews yet to summarise bugs or requests.

eSmartLock

Reported bugs

19 issues
  • Cannot complete registration - password validation fails
  • App won't accept valid passwords meeting stated requirements
  • Bluetooth disconnects within seconds of connection
  • Lock icon displays incorrect state (always shows unlocked)
  • Fingerprint reader fails to save or update fingerprints
Show 14 more
  • App loses connection to lock randomly
  • User management section disappears from app
  • Cards stop working after app download
  • Card reconnection function doesn't work
  • Watch app stays in 'connecting' state indefinitely
  • App won't load past opening screen
  • Fingerprint placement sensitivity too strict
  • Power-saving mode popup appears in Chinese despite English selection
  • Cannot create new user accounts
  • Password reset and account recovery broken
  • Logout doesn't clear stored credentials
  • Keyboard input issues in password/security question fields
  • Bluetooth pairing fails after initial setup
  • Lock won't recognize fingerprints in rain or when wet

Requested features

12 requests
  • Apple Watch standalone app without phone requirement
  • Widget integration for quick access
  • Apple Home integration
  • Single-button unlock without opening app
  • Account password reset functionality
Show 7 more
  • Battery level indicator in app
  • Ability to keep door unlocked without complex scheduling
  • Remote access to activity logs without physical lock
  • Improved Bluetooth range
  • QR code sharing for easy user addition
  • Account sharing between family members
  • Siri control on Apple Watch

In-app purchases

None

FC SmartHome

No in-app purchases

3 purchases

eSmartLock

One-time3
  • Cloud Storage 30-day (7)$1.99
  • Cloud Storage 180-day (7)$6.99
  • Cloud Storage 360-day (7)$9.99

Questions

Is FC SmartHome free?
FC SmartHome is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is eSmartLock free?
eSmartLock is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Which has better reviews, FC SmartHome or eSmartLock?
eSmartLock is rated higher. FC SmartHome averages 1.7 out of 5 from 15 ratings, while eSmartLock averages 2.3 from 159 ratings.
Do FC SmartHome or eSmartLock have ads?
Neither FC SmartHome nor eSmartLock shows ads.
Which is updated more often, FC SmartHome or eSmartLock?
FC SmartHome ships an update every 2 months, and eSmartLock every 2 months. Most recently, FC SmartHome was updated on June 1, 2026 and eSmartLock on September 26, 2026.

Other comparisons