Comparison

TimeCode Generator vs TubeLoad

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

TimeCode Generator

This application generates and plays multichannel SMPTE LTC, MIDI, and ArtNet timecode. It features a user-friendly interface with customizable offsets and automatic setting storage, making it ideal for rehearsing timecode shows.

Highlights
  • Output LTC, MTC, and ArtNet timecode
  • Customizable time offset
  • Big clock reference
  • Unlimited channels
  • Automatic setting storage
  • Audio interface selection
Features
Read full description

TimeCode Generator is a simple app that allows you to play multichannel SMPTE LTC timecode, Midi timecode and ArtNet timecode, from within this simple app. - Output LTC Timecode, MTC Timecode (MIDI) and ArtNet Timecode - Easy and clear interface - Uses all industry standard Frames per second - Use custom offset, anywhere from milliseconds to hours - Set the computer time as starttime (wall clock) - Uses big clock for reference - Unlimited number of channels - Skip in time - Stores your settings automaticly - Perfect tool for rehearsing timecode shows. - Audio interface selection for use with external audio interfaces - Lock controls

About

TubeLoad

Features
Read full description

TubeCalc is a fast structural calculator for aluminium and steel tubes, designed for film-set riggers, grips, scaffolders, and anyone who needs to verify load limits in the field. Four loading configurations: • Simple — single point load on a simply-supported tube • Two Loads — two independent loads, anywhere along the span • Cantilever — fixed at one end, load at the free end • Boom — overhanging beam with counterweight and adjustable support Calculates: • Deflection (with L/120 serviceability limit) • Bending moment and bending stress • Maximum safe point load • Shear force and bending moment diagrams • Support reactions Material library includes 6000-series aluminium alloys (6060, 6061-T6, 6082) and structural steel grades (S235–S420) — both EU and US variants. Other features: • Adjustable design factor (1:1 to 7:1, or custom) • Metric and imperial units • Save tube presets for quick recall across all calculators • Interactive beam diagrams — drag loads to see live updates • Works offline Important: TubeCalc is an engineering aid, not a substitute for a qualified structural engineer. Always have rigging verified for safety-critical applications.

Screenshots

TimeCode Generator4 screens
TubeLoad4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is price: TubeLoad at $3.99 against TimeCode Generator's $16.99. TimeCode Generator's advantage is iOS requirement (11.0 vs 15.1). On ads, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

TimeCode Generator costs $16.99 and TubeLoad $3.99 up front. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

Scorecard2 real differences · 8 level
TimeCode Generator versus TubeLoad: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterTimeCode GeneratorTubeLoad
Price$16.99$3.99 — better
Rating3.7 (17 ratings) — better—
Positive reviews33.3% of reviews—
Number of ratings17 — better—
Update frequencyEvery 6 months—
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationPaid—
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod, Mac — betteriPhone, iPad, iPod
Requires iOS11.0 — better15.1
Further details — not scored
Size5 MB27 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperHaute Technique BVTIMO TAPIO HAAPASAARI

In-app purchases

None

TimeCode Generator

No in-app purchases

None

TubeLoad

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is TimeCode Generator free?
TimeCode Generator costs $16.99, with no in-app purchases.
Is TubeLoad free?
TubeLoad costs $3.99, with no in-app purchases.
Do TimeCode Generator or TubeLoad have ads?
Neither TimeCode Generator nor TubeLoad shows ads.

Other comparisons