Comparison

Proteus Motion vs FTRS Athletic Tracking

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

Proteus Motion

This app provides advanced performance training and recovery analytics. It enables low-impact, high-efficiency 3D resistance training. A Proteus System user account is required to use the app.

Highlights
  • Performance training analytics
  • Recovery analytics
  • 3D resistance training
  • High efficiency training
  • Low-impact training
Features
Read full description

Proteus Motion is leading the reinvention of performance training and recovery. The Proteus System delivers breakthrough analytics and first-ever 3D resistance training for high efficiency, low-impact training. NOTE: This app requires an active user account with the Proteus System.

About

FTRS Athletic Tracking

This app helps athletes track sleep, nutrition, and body weight against their goals. It integrates with Garmin watches for sleep data and allows quick meal logging with macro estimation. Personalized targets adapt to individual fitness objectives.

Highlights
  • Automatic sleep tracking via Garmin integration
  • Quick meal logging with macro estimation
  • Personalized calorie and protein targets
  • Body weight tracking with rolling average
  • Adherence tracking for nutrition and sleep goals
  • Goal-adaptive target setting
Features
Read full description

The FTRS Athletic Tracking app is the daily companion for athletes training at Futures. Built around the same sports-science principles that drive our coaching, it gives you one place to see how your sleep, nutrition, and body weight are tracking against your goals — so the numbers stay tied to the work you put in on the floor. WHAT YOU GET • Recovery — Connect your Garmin watch and we'll pull your overnight sleep in automatically from Garmin Connect™: total sleep against your nightly target, a full stage breakdown (deep, REM, light, and awake), and a hypnogram of how the night actually unfolded. The trends that matter for recovery, with nothing to log by hand. • Nutrition — Log meals in seconds. Snap a photo or describe your meal in a few words and we'll estimate the macros for you — or enter them yourself. Daily calorie and protein targets are personalized to your stats and training goal. • Weight & Trends — Track body weight over time with a smoothed 7-day rolling average, so you see the real signal under the daily noise. Adherence cards show how consistently you're hitting your nutrition and sleep targets, week over week. • Built around your goal — Whether you're cutting, maintaining, or putting on lean mass, your targets adapt to where you are and where you're trying to go. DESIGNED FOR FUTURES MEMBERS The FTRS Athletic Tracking app is an exclusive tool for active members of Futures Training Center. Account creation is restricted to current members on our roster. Not a member yet and want access? Visit futurestrainingcenter.com. YOUR DATA, YOUR CONTROL We never sell your data, never run ads, and never share your information with advertisers. Garmin data is fetched in a secure server-to-server flow solely to display your own recovery metrics inside the app. Meal photos are used only to estimate macros — nothing else. Full details are in our Privacy Policy.

Screenshots

Proteus Motion4 screens
FTRS Athletic Tracking3 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: FTRS Athletic Tracking at 5.0 against Proteus Motion's 3.0. FTRS Athletic Tracking also leads on update cadence (weekly vs every 6 months). On price, ratings volume, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

FTRS Athletic Tracking holds the better App Store score, 5.0 against 3.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 2 and 1 respectively.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

Proteus Motion ships an update every 6 months, FTRS Athletic Tracking weekly. The most recent releases landed on October 14, 2026 and October 5, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard2 real differences · 8 level
Proteus Motion versus FTRS Athletic Tracking: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterProteus MotionFTRS Athletic Tracking
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.0 (2 ratings)5.0 (1 ratings) — better
Positive reviews0.0% of reviews—
Number of ratings2 — better1
Update frequencyEvery 6 monthsWeekly — better
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPodiPhone, iPod
Requires iOS15.115.1
Further details — not scored
Size38 MB37 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperProteus Motion Inc.Futures Training Center LLC

Customer experience

Proteus Motion

All ratings2 ratings
Positive50.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative50.0%
Written reviews1 reviews
Positive0.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative100.0%

FTRS Athletic Tracking

All ratings1 ratings
Positive100.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative0.0%

In-app purchases

None

Proteus Motion

No in-app purchases

None

FTRS Athletic Tracking

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is Proteus Motion free?
Proteus Motion is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is FTRS Athletic Tracking free?
FTRS Athletic Tracking is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, Proteus Motion or FTRS Athletic Tracking?
FTRS Athletic Tracking is rated higher. Proteus Motion averages 3.0 out of 5 from 2 ratings, while FTRS Athletic Tracking averages 5.0 from 1 ratings.
Do Proteus Motion or FTRS Athletic Tracking have ads?
Neither Proteus Motion nor FTRS Athletic Tracking shows ads.
Which is updated more often, Proteus Motion or FTRS Athletic Tracking?
Proteus Motion ships an update every 6 months, and FTRS Athletic Tracking weekly. Most recently, Proteus Motion was updated on October 14, 2026 and FTRS Athletic Tracking on October 5, 2026.

Other comparisons