Comparison

SugarCRM vs EDA ProspectMobile

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

SugarCRM

Manage customer relationships and business processes from anywhere. Access contacts, accounts, leads, and custom modules to update opportunities, schedule activities, and generate quotes on the go.

Highlights
  • Access contacts, accounts, leads, and custom modules
  • Update opportunities and view account details
  • Schedule calls and create cases
  • Generate pricing quotes
  • View dashboards and KPIs
  • Manage task lists
  • Map customer locations and plan routes
Features
Read full description

Customer relationship management anywhere, anytime—so you are always prepared to win deals and support customers on the go. With the SugarAI mobile app, you can take your business processes and CRM data on the go, including access to contacts, accounts, leads, activities, and custom Sugar modules. Benefits: • View detailed account information on the go, and update opportunities as you gather insights. • Schedule calls, create cases, or send quotes directly from your mobile device. • See who's calling and get prepared with Caller ID. • Create documents based on record data from the mobile app with Doc Merge. • View key performance indicators (KPIs) and stay on track with your sales goals. • Build pricing quotes to close deals in real-time, wherever you are. • Access insights at a glance with dashboards: charts, activity history, and more. • Manage your task list by completing or adding new tasks. • Map customer locations and initiate driving routes to streamline customer visits and planning.

About

EDA ProspectMobile

Access your prospect database and identify top sales opportunities while on the go. Ideal for field sales, this app provides detailed company insights, credit risk, and location-based searching.

Highlights
  • Access EDA prospect database
  • Search by address or current location
  • Map and list view of prospects
  • Filter searches by proximity
  • Favorite prospects
  • Add custom notes
  • View D&B Insight data
Features
Read full description

EDA ProspectMobile is data-driven market insight at your fingertips. Find prospects wherever you are. This powerful app lets you easily access your EDA database of prospects and target your top opportunities while on the road. ▪ Ideal for in-the-field prospecting and sales call planning ▪ Provides insight to Sales Reps and OEM Dealers ▪ Efficient and timely distribution of sales leads ▪ Available to all EDA subscribers Features Include: ▪ Search by address or current location ▪ Identify prospects within a map or list view ▪ Filter your searches by proximity ▪ Favorite your ideal sales prospects ▪ Add custom notes per prospect ▪ Prospect Overview -- company name, address and contact -- equipment unit count -- distance to location -- brands, equipment types and new/used preference -- most recent financing activity ▪ D&B® Insight -- credit risk -- employees (est.) -- annual sales (est.) -- D-U-N-S® Parent Number -- NAICS industry classification -- industry type -- year established Note: Requires EDA data subscription.

Screenshots

SugarCRM4 screens
EDA ProspectMobile4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: SugarCRM at 4.1 against EDA ProspectMobile's 3.1. SugarCRM also leads on ads (none vs shown) and review sentiment (48% vs 33%). On price, update cadence, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

SugarCRM holds the better App Store score, 4.1 against 3.1. That said, the two scores are not equally well evidenced: SugarCRM has 74 ratings behind it against 10, so its average is the more settled of the two. Written reviews point the same way: 48% of SugarCRM's written reviews are positive against 33% of EDA ProspectMobile's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

SugarCRM ships an update monthly, EDA ProspectMobile every 6 weeks. The most recent releases landed on October 8, 2026 and September 28, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard5 real differences · 5 level
SugarCRM versus EDA ProspectMobile: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterSugarCRMEDA ProspectMobile
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.1 (74 ratings) — better3.1 (10 ratings)
Positive reviews48.1% of reviews — better33.3% of reviews
Number of ratings74 — better10
Update frequencyMonthly — betterEvery 6 weeks
AdsNo — betterYes
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFree — betterAd-supported
DevicesiPhone, iPadiPhone, iPad, iPod — better
Requires iOS16.0 — better16.6
Further details — not scored
Size21 MB48 MB
Age rating4+4+
DeveloperSugarCRM, Inc.Randall-Reilly, LLC

Customer experience

SugarCRM

All ratings74 ratings
Positive77.0%
Neutral1.4%
Negative21.6%
Written reviews52 reviews
Positive48.1%
Neutral7.7%
Negative44.2%

EDA ProspectMobile

All ratings10 ratings
Positive50.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative50.0%
Written reviews9 reviews
Positive33.3%
Neutral11.1%
Negative55.6%

In-app purchases

None

SugarCRM

No in-app purchases

None

EDA ProspectMobile

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is SugarCRM free?
SugarCRM is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is EDA ProspectMobile free?
EDA ProspectMobile is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, SugarCRM or EDA ProspectMobile?
SugarCRM is rated higher. SugarCRM averages 4.1 out of 5 from 74 ratings, while EDA ProspectMobile averages 3.1 from 10 ratings.
Do SugarCRM or EDA ProspectMobile have ads?
EDA ProspectMobile shows ads; SugarCRM does not.
Which is updated more often, SugarCRM or EDA ProspectMobile?
SugarCRM ships an update monthly, and EDA ProspectMobile every 6 weeks. Most recently, SugarCRM was updated on October 8, 2026 and EDA ProspectMobile on September 28, 2026.

Other comparisons