Comparison

168 Fasting vs FastLeaf

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

168 Fasting

Read full description

168 Fasting is a quiet, mindful companion for 16:8 intermittent fasting — for people who prefer stillness over streaks. 【Why 168 Fasting】 • Japanese wabi-sabi aesthetic: rice paper tones and pine green • Clean 16:8 timer: 8 hours eating, 16 hours fasting • Gentle reminders at 60, 30, and 15 minutes before your window closes • Solar terms and lunar calendar alongside modern dates • No ads • No subscription paywalls • No social feeds

About

FastLeaf

Features
Read full description

FastLeaf makes intermittent fasting simple and easy to stick with. ■ Live Fasting Timer See exactly how long you've been fasting and how far you are from your goal. It stays accurate even if you close the app or restart your phone — elapsed time is based on your real start time. ■ Your Body, Stage by Stage Digestion → blood sugar → fat burning → ketosis → autophagy. See what stage your body is in right now and how long until the next one. ■ 6 Proven Protocols From 12:12 to 16:8, 18:6, 20:4 and OMAD (23:1). Pick the plan that fits you, beginner to advanced. ■ History & Streaks Log every fast and build your streak. A 15-week heatmap and session history make consistency visible. ■ Insights Average and longest fasts, goal completion rate and weekly trends — all in clear stats. ■ Reminders Get notified when you reach your goal and when your eating window ends. FastLeaf Pro (one-time lifetime purchase) · All protocols · Unlimited history · Full body-state timeline · Advanced stats · Home widget · No ads No subscription. Pay once, yours forever. Note: This app is for general wellness information and is not medical advice. Consult a professional if you are pregnant or have a condition such as diabetes.

Screenshots

168 Fasting4 screens
FastLeaf4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is in-app purchases: 168 Fasting at none against FastLeaf's 1. 168 Fasting also leads on ads (none vs shown). On price, device support and iOS requirement there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. FastLeaf sells 1 one-off in-app purchase. 168 Fasting asks for nothing beyond the download.

Scorecard2 real differences · 4 level
168 Fasting versus FastLeaf: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
Parameter168 FastingFastLeaf
PriceFreeFree
Update frequency—Every 2 weeks
AdsNo — betterYes
In-app purchasesNo — betterYes
DevicesiPhoneiPhone, iPod — better
Requires iOS16.015.0 — better
Further details — not scored
Size3 MB96 MB
Age rating4+4+
Developer一鸥 张SEONYONG LEE

In-app purchases

None

168 Fasting

No in-app purchases

1 purchases

FastLeaf

One-time1
  • FastLeaf Pro$2.99

Questions

Is 168 Fasting free?
168 Fasting is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is FastLeaf free?
FastLeaf is free to download, with in-app purchases available.
Do 168 Fasting or FastLeaf have ads?
FastLeaf shows ads; 168 Fasting does not.

Other comparisons