Comparison

NenaMark3 vs Breaking Limit

Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.

Head to head
About

NenaMark3

This application serves as a benchmark to measure the 3D graphics performance of a system. It gradually increases scene complexity to determine the point at which frame rates drop below 60 FPS, aiding in comparisons between different devices for gaming and 3D applications.

Highlights
  • Measures 3D graphics performance
  • Gradually increases scene complexity
  • Determines frame rate drop point
  • Compares system performance
  • Assesses suitability for 3D apps and games
Features
Read full description

Nenamark3 is a benchmark that measures the 3d performance of a system by gradually increasing the complexity of a scene until the frame rate drops below 60. Purpose Nenamark3 is run to compare different systems against each other from a 3d graphics perspective. A 3d graphics benchmark tries to show how well a system will perform in games or or apps that make use of 3d graphics. 3D Graphics Apps A 3d app, such as a game, will typically have individual settings for different tiers of devices. A lo-end system will have less features and look less amazing than a hi-end system. If hi-end settings are used on a lo-end system it will not be able to maintain its frame rate of 60 fps, causing it to drop frames and “stutter”. What a 3D benchmark should do This means that a graphics benchmark should define a set of scenes of increasing complexity and find how far a system can go while maintaining 60 fps. The common way of running static scenes and measure the fps have several problems. First, it is not relevant to run at any other frame rate than 60. It is not certain that lower fps are comparable to each other. All we can say for certain is - did it make 60 or not? Second, once 60 is reached where do you go? While it is possible to do off screen render and let the fps go as high as it can this is also irrelevant. If you have more power you would probably want more advanced features rather than more of the lesser features (perhaps you’d want a more correct lighting model rather than say more geometry). Go Slow There is a point to scaling the complexity gradually over time. Especially embedded systems have quite sophisticated clock governors that speeds up the clocks when needed, even for the GPU. These sample the load at certain intervals and adapt so it makes sense to slowly build complexity. In a game there would be a few slow frames before the system could react which would be annoying but not critical.

About

Breaking Limit

This app is a cross-platform graphics benchmark that uses raytracing technology to compare performance across mobile and desktop devices. It includes various tests and uploads results to an online scoreboard for ranking.

Highlights
  • Cross-platform graphics benchmark
  • Raytracing technology
  • Raytraced Shadows and Reflections
  • Official benchmark tests
  • Customizable settings
  • Online scoreboard comparison
Features
Read full description

Breaking Limit is a true cross-platform graphics benchmark for mobile and desktop platforms, enabling effortless comparison of graphics performance across various devices by utilizing the same workload. It leverages cutting-edge Raytracing technology, including Raytraced Shadows and Reflections. The results obtained by running the Official benchmarks are uploaded to Powerboard online scoreboard. There, you may compare your results against others and see where you rank. Included Tests: - Official: The main benchmark that uses standard settings. - Official Native: Uses the same content and settings as Official, but uses device’s display resolution as the rendering resolution. - Custom: Uses the same content as Official, but allows users to change settings from the default ones used in Official.

Screenshots

NenaMark34 screens
Breaking Limit4 screens

Verdict

The call

The clearest difference is rating: Breaking Limit at 3.8 against NenaMark3's 3.0. Breaking Limit also leads on review sentiment (75% vs 67%). NenaMark3's advantage is update cadence (every 3 weeks vs every 10 months) and iOS requirement (7.1 vs 18.5). On price, ratings volume, ads and in-app purchases there is nothing between them.

Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS

CostPrice · In-app purchases · Ads · Monetization

Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.

ReceptionRating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings

Breaking Limit holds the better App Store score, 3.8 against 3.0. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 2 and 4 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 67% of NenaMark3's written reviews are positive against 75% of Breaking Limit's.

UpkeepUpdate frequency

NenaMark3 ships an update every 3 weeks, Breaking Limit every 10 months. The most recent releases landed on October 21, 2026 and October 24, 2026 respectively.

Scorecard4 real differences · 6 level
NenaMark3 versus Breaking Limit: the parameters behind the verdict, then further details
ParameterNenaMark3Breaking Limit
PriceFreeFree
Rating3.0 (2 ratings)3.8 (4 ratings) — better
Positive reviews66.7% of reviews75.0% of reviews — better
Number of ratings24 — better
Update frequencyEvery 3 weeks — betterEvery 10 months
AdsNoNo
In-app purchasesNoNo
MonetizationFreeFree
DevicesiPhone, iPad, iPod — betteriPhone, iPad
Requires iOS7.1 — better18.5
Further details — not scored
Size34 MB407 MB
Age rating4+9+
DeveloperNena Innovation ABBasemark

Customer experience

NenaMark3

All ratings2 ratings
Positive50.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative50.0%
Written reviews3 reviews
Positive66.7%
Neutral0.0%
Negative33.3%

Breaking Limit

All ratings3 ratings
Positive66.7%
Neutral0.0%
Negative33.3%
Written reviews4 reviews
Positive75.0%
Neutral0.0%
Negative25.0%

In-app purchases

None

NenaMark3

No in-app purchases

None

Breaking Limit

No in-app purchases

Questions

Is NenaMark3 free?
NenaMark3 is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Is Breaking Limit free?
Breaking Limit is free to download, with no in-app purchases.
Which has better reviews, NenaMark3 or Breaking Limit?
Breaking Limit is rated higher. NenaMark3 averages 3.0 out of 5 from 2 ratings, while Breaking Limit averages 3.8 from 4 ratings.
Do NenaMark3 or Breaking Limit have ads?
Neither NenaMark3 nor Breaking Limit shows ads.
Which is updated more often, NenaMark3 or Breaking Limit?
NenaMark3 ships an update every 3 weeks, and Breaking Limit every 10 months. Most recently, NenaMark3 was updated on October 21, 2026 and Breaking Limit on October 24, 2026.

Other comparisons