DexterPay vs Launderday
Price, ratings, monetisation and update history for both apps, side by side — with what reviewers say about each.
DexterPay
Simplify laundry with this mobile payment solution. Avoid physical currency by paying for your laundry cycles directly through the app. Receive timely notifications when your laundry is done, allowing you to manage your time more effectively.
- Mobile laundry payment
- Secure payment processing
- Cycle status tracking
- Completion notifications
- Location selection
Read full descriptionHide full description
Ready to make laundry day easy? DexterPay is just what you need. Stop juggling quarters and use mobile pay instead. Plus, you’ll be notified when your cycle is finished so you can make the most of your wait time. • Download the DexterPay app • Select your location • Choose your cycle options • Pay securely • Track your cycle status • Receive notifications when your cycle is complete
Launderday
This app allows users to pay for and control GE Appliances Commercial Laundry machines directly from their smartphone. It eliminates the need for coins, offers real-time cycle monitoring, and provides notifications when laundry is finished.
- Mobile payment for laundry
- Connect to GE Commercial Laundry machines
- Real-time cycle monitoring
- Machine notifications
- No coins needed
Read full descriptionHide full description
Lighten the load with the GE Appliances Launderday App. First, download the Launderday App to your smartphone. Then input your payment details into the secure payment portal. Scan your GE Appliances Commercial Laundry machine to connect and see pricing. Then load your laundry, select your cycle, and press start on the machine. No coins necessary. Spend more time doing what you love with features like real-time cycle monitoring and machine notifications. You’ll be notified when your cycle is almost finished and then again when it’s complete! Live life on full spin. Download the Launderday App today.
Screenshots
Verdict
The clearest difference is rating: DexterPay at 1.9 against Launderday's 1.4. DexterPay also leads on ads (none vs shown) and monetization model (free vs free with in-app purchases). On price, ratings volume, in-app purchases and device support there is nothing between them.
Scored on Price · Rating · Positive reviews · Number of ratings · Update frequency · Ads · In-app purchases · Monetization · Best chart rank · Devices · Requires iOS
Both are free to download. Neither carries in-app purchases, so what you see is what you pay.
DexterPay holds the better App Store score, 1.9 against 1.4. Both are backed by a comparable volume of ratings — 198 and 82 respectively. Written reviews point the same way: 16% of DexterPay's written reviews are positive against 2% of Launderday's.
DexterPay ships an update every 3 months, Launderday every 7 months. The most recent releases landed on September 25, 2026 and September 21, 2026 respectively.
| Parameter | DexterPay | Launderday |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 1.9 (198 ratings) — better | 1.4 (82 ratings) |
| Positive reviews | 16.1% of reviews — better | 2.3% of reviews |
| Number of ratings | 198 — better | 82 |
| Update frequency | Every 3 months — better | Every 7 months |
| Ads | No — better | Yes |
| In-app purchases | No | No |
| Monetization | Free — better | Free with in-app purchases |
| Devices | iPhone, iPad, iPod — better | iPhone, iPod |
| Requires iOS | 15.0 | 15.0 |
| Further details — not scored | ||
| Size | 44 MB | 73 MB |
| Age rating | 4+ | 4+ |
| Developer | Dexter Laundry, Inc. | HAIER US APPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC |
Customer experience
DexterPay
Launderday
Bugs and requests
DexterPay
Reported bugs
4 issues- App crashes
- Payment issues
- Connectivity problems
- Incorrect machine recognition
Requested features
4 requests- Ability to delete account
- Improved customer support
- Live status of available machines
- Clearer pricing and fees
Launderday
Not enough reviews yet to summarise bugs or requests.
In-app purchases
DexterPay
No in-app purchases
Launderday
No in-app purchases
