Easy to use
Nice and easy to use
Can’t access my money
The app has been down for hours which means I can’t make transactions on a Friday night. Cheers duckhids
Phone Version
Not working for some reason.
Vote against
Response to developer feedback:
I think their rambling corporate response proves my point. They have shown extreme disrespect to me personally as is evidenced in this response. Don’t you dare call me “Dear”. Disgusting behaviour from this bank and I’m sure the board are voting themselves nice pay rises while charges us more. Also “Profit for purpose” is the funniest/scariest corpo jargon I’ve heard in a long time. Is that like “The Human Fund”?
This company and app claims to want us to make an “informed choice” but has failed and refuses to offer any information on the case against merger by the time voting opens and likely for a significant portion of the voting process, if at all, while heavily promoting and marketing their case to merge. They claimed they believe this is fair and respectful to members.
This is morally reprehensible and bankrupt behaviour. How is it even legal? If it is then the law clearly needs to change. It completely disrespects members’ ability to make the right choice when informed fairly about the pros and cons of a decision. When has less competition ever been a good thing for consumers, not to mention diluting the focus on the special needs of teachers and their families? I’ve witnessed the declining quality and care from this bank for years but they try to do it slowly enough that you don’t notice, and this trend will no doubt continue following further mergers.
Absolutely disgusting and shameful behaviour from the leadership board.
I think their rambling corporate response proves my point. They have shown extreme disrespect to me personally as is evidenced in this response. Don’t you dare call me “Dear”. Disgusting behaviour from this bank and I’m sure the board are voting themselves nice pay rises while charges us more. Also “Profit for purpose” is the funniest/scariest corpo jargon I’ve heard in a long time. Is that like “The Human Fund”?
This company and app claims to want us to make an “informed choice” but has failed and refuses to offer any information on the case against merger by the time voting opens and likely for a significant portion of the voting process, if at all, while heavily promoting and marketing their case to merge. They claimed they believe this is fair and respectful to members.
This is morally reprehensible and bankrupt behaviour. How is it even legal? If it is then the law clearly needs to change. It completely disrespects members’ ability to make the right choice when informed fairly about the pros and cons of a decision. When has less competition ever been a good thing for consumers, not to mention diluting the focus on the special needs of teachers and their families? I’ve witnessed the declining quality and care from this bank for years but they try to do it slowly enough that you don’t notice, and this trend will no doubt continue following further mergers.
Absolutely disgusting and shameful behaviour from the leadership board.
Show more
Vote against
This company and app claims to want us to make an “informed choice” but has failed and refuses to offer any information on the case against merger by the time voting opens and likely for a significant portion of the voting process, if at all, while heavily promoting and marketing their case to merge. They claimed they believe this is fair and respectful to members.
This is morally reprehensible and bankrupt behaviour. How is it even legal? If it is then the law clearly needs to change. It completely disrespects members’ ability to make the right choice when informed fairly about the pros and cons of a decision. When has less competition ever been a good thing for consumers, not to mention diluting the focus on the special needs of teachers and their families? I’ve witnessed the declining quality and care from this bank for years but they try to do it slowly enough that you don’t notice, and this trend will no doubt continue following further mergers.
Absolutely disgusting and shameful behaviour from the leadership board.
This is morally reprehensible and bankrupt behaviour. How is it even legal? If it is then the law clearly needs to change. It completely disrespects members’ ability to make the right choice when informed fairly about the pros and cons of a decision. When has less competition ever been a good thing for consumers, not to mention diluting the focus on the special needs of teachers and their families? I’ve witnessed the declining quality and care from this bank for years but they try to do it slowly enough that you don’t notice, and this trend will no doubt continue following further mergers.
Absolutely disgusting and shameful behaviour from the leadership board.
Show more
